Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Status:
Executed
by lethal injection in Texas on February 25, 2003
Summary:
Jeanette Williams was 47 years old and confined to a wheelchair for
22 years. She took pain medication and had also become addicted to
crack cocaine. She was an acquaintance of Bruce and Michelle
Gillmore, and had lived with the Gillmores at various times.
Mr. Gillmore took out a $25,000 life insurance policy on Jeanette
and designated himself as the beneficiary.
The Gilmores recruited Richard Williams (no relation) to kill
Jeanette for $12,000.
On March 24, 1997, Williams, Jeanette and the Gillmores drove to the
Third Ward in Houston, apparently to buy cocaine for Jeanette and
Michelle Gillmore.
While Bruce Gillmore stayed in the car, Williams and Michelle
Gillmore pushed Jeanette in her wheelchair toward the corner to
supposedly purchase the drugs. Williams then grabbed Jeanette's
forehead from behind and, using a nine-inch steak knife, slit
Jeanette's throat. Once Jeanette fell from her wheelchair, Williams
repeatedly stabbed her in the chest.
During the investigation, the Gilmores implicated Williams, who
confessed to the murder on videotape. Williams had been convicted in
1987 of burglary, arson and aggravated sexual assault, and was
discharged one month before the murder. The Gilmores each received
Life Sentences.
Final Meal:
Two chili cheese dogs, two cheeseburgers, two orders of onion rings
with French dressing, turkey salad with French fries, chocolate cake,
apple pie, butter pecan ice cream, egg rolls, one peach, three Dr.
Peppers, jalapeno peppers, ketchup, and mayonnaise.
Final Words:
"The statement I would like to make is to all my loved ones - and to
the Abrahams and Williams families. We came a long way through the
tragedy - from hate to love and I would like to apologize for the
pain I have caused all my families on both sides. I am looking at
you Mr. Frank: I am sorry brother for what happened to your sister
and I hope that you would forgive me one day. Ask God to forgive me
and ask God to forgive you and allow me to pass through. My brother
Farooq, I love you my brother and send my love to all my family
members. And I was not a monster like they said I was. I made a
mistake and this mistake cost - but they won't cost no more. I leave
you with all my love and blessings. may Allah bless each and every
one of you."
ClarkProsecutor.org
Texas Attorney General
Media Advisory
Monday, February 24, 2003
Richard Head Williams Scheduled to be Executed.
AUSTIN - Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott
offers the following information on Richard Head Williams, who is
scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 25, 2003. On
Nov. 21, 1997, Richard Head Williams was sentenced to death for the
capital murder of Jeanette Williams, which occurred in Houston,
Texas, on March 27, 1997. A summary of the evidence presented at
trial follows:
FACTS OF THE CRIME
Jeanette Williams ("Jeanette") was 47 years old
and confined to a wheelchair for 22 years. She took pain medication
and had also become addicted to crack cocaine. She was an
acquaintance of Bruce and Michelle Gillmore, and had lived with the
Gillmores at various times. Mr. Gillmore took out a $25,000 life
insurance policy on Jeanette and designated himself as the
beneficiary.
After being released from a 10 year prison
sentence, Richard Head Williams (no relation to the victim) went to
live with a friend named Jerrol Blueford. Jeanette and the Gillmores
were also friends with Blueford.
Several days prior to the murder,
Bruce Gillmore approached Blueford about killing Jeanette so that,
as beneficiary, he could collect the life insurance proceeds.
Blueford refused the offer, but he introduced Mr. Gillmore to
Williams.
Bruce Gillmore promised to pay Williams $12,000 if he
murdered Jeanette. Williams agreed to the bargain.
On March 24, 1997, Williams, Jeanette and the
Gillmores drove to the Third Ward in Houston, apparently to buy
cocaine for Jeanette and Michelle Gillmore.
While Bruce Gillmore
stayed in the car, Williams and Michelle Gillmore pushed Jeanette in
her wheelchair toward the corner to supposedly purchase the drugs.
Williams then grabbed Jeanette's forehead from behind and, using a
nine-inch steak knife, slit Jeanette's throat.
Once Jeanette fell
from her wheelchair, Williams repeatedly stabbed her in the chest.
Bruce and Michelle Gillmore drove away and left Williams at the
crime scene. They drove to Blueford's house and told him that
Williams was crazy, and that Williams had murdered Jeanette.
The
Gillmores gave Blueford $400 to give to Williams as payment for the
murder. They also instructed him not to tell Williams where they
were going.
When Williams returned to Blueford's house, his
hand was wrapped in a blood-soaked towel. Williams asked Blueford if
the Gillmores had left anything for him. Blueford gave Williams the
$400. Williams became noticeably upset over the amount of money, and
told Blueford that he would find and murder the Gillmores because
they owed him more.
The officers who responded to the crime scene
initially believed Jeanette was killed in a hit and run accident.
She was lying in the street in a pool of blood with her wheelchair
approximately three feet away. When the body was turned over,
however, the officers discovered the gaping wound to the neck and
numerous stab wounds to the chest.
According to the medical examiner,
the wound to the victim's throat severed her jugular vein and
windpipe. It was determined that the victim suffocated and bled to
death.
The investigation of the murder provided several
telephone numbers, which led to the Gillmores, who in turn
implicated Williams. Williams confessed to the murder on videotape.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Williams was indicted in the 174th District Court
of Harris County, Texas, for the capital offense of murdering
Jeanette Williams on March 27, 1997 for remuneration or the promise
of remuneration. Williams pleaded not guilty and was tried before a
jury.
The jury found Williams guilty of capital murder on Oct. 28,
1997, and, on Nov. 21, 1997, following a separate punishment hearing,
the court assessed Williams' punishment at death by lethal injection.
Williams' conviction and sentence were
automatically appealed to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which
affirmed in an unpublished opinion on May 12, 1999. Williams did not
seek certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court.
On Jan. 25, 1999, Williams filed an application
for writ of habeas corpus in state court. After the state habeas
court entered detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law
recommending that habeas relief be denied, the Court of Criminal
Appeals denied the application in an unpublished order on Feb. 9,
2000.
After obtaining appointment of counsel, Williams
filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus on Aug. 4, 2000, in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas,
Houston Division. The district court denied habeas relief on Sept.
27, 2001.
Thereafter, on July 25, 2002, the United States Court of
Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied Williams a certificate of
appealability in an unpublished opinion. Williams then filed a
petition for writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme Court.
The Court denied certiorari on Dec. 2, 2002.
On Feb. 11, 2003, Williams filed a subsequent
application for state habeas relief in the 174th District Court of
Harris County. His application is still pending.
PRIOR CRIMINAL HISTORY
During punishment, the evidence indicated that
Williams had previously served a 10-year sentence in the Texas
Department of Corrections for burglary of a building, burglary of a
railroad car, arson, and aggravated sexual assault. The State also
showed that, while serving his sentence, Williams was subjected to
discipline on multiple occasions for assaulting and threatening
correctional officers, for spitting in the face of a correctional
officer, and for possessing contraband.
ProDeathPenalty.com
Richard Williams was convicted of the contract
murder of 48-year-old Jeanette Williams, who was in a wheelchair and
is no relation. For $400, Richard Williams cut her throat and
stabbed her repeatedly with an 8-inch steak knife and left her body
in the middle of a southeast Houston street on March 24, 1997. The
married couple who arranged the killing, Bruce and Michelle Gilmore,
received life sentences.
Williams, 33, is seeking to have his execution
delayed on the grounds that he may be mentally retarded, a defense
made possible last year when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
executing the mentally retarded is cruel and unusual punishment. A
victims advocate called mental retardation the "brass ring" for
death row defendants.
At least seven Texas death row inmates have
had their executions postponed on the grounds that they may be
mentally retarded. The latest was Gregory Van Alstyne, who was
scheduled to be executed last Tuesday. Several more appeals on the
grounds of mental retardation are pending. The Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals has not yet ruled on Williams' claim. "I'm trying
to get off death row," Williams said. "I've got a life to live."
A Harris County jury in 1997 convicted Williams
of murdering 44-year-old Jeanette Williams, no relation. Richard
Williams turned himself in after his brothers told him police were
looking for him. He confessed to the contract killing, then pleaded
not guilty at trial. In the confession, Williams said Bruce and
Michelle Gilmore offered him $12,000 to kill Jeanette Williams,
their friend. They wanted to collect on the $25,000 life insurance
policy they had taken out on the woman.
The Gilmores are serving
life sentences for their role in the crime. A crack addict who had
been paralyzed for two decades, Jeanette Williams had lived with the
Gilmores on and off for about six years, even moving with them among
Houston, Oklahoma and South Carolina.
Richard Williams had been out of prison for less
than a month when he met the trio. He had served 10 years for a
crime spree that included two burglaries, arson and aggravated
sexual assault, all committed when he was 17 years old. Williams was
staying with his friend Jerrol Blueford when the Gilmores and
Jeanette Williams came over for a visit, according to trial
testimony.
Bruce Gilmore took Richard Williams outside to solicit
his help in the murder. Williams confessed to police that he agreed
to the crime then. The three co-defendants hashed out the details
and price over several subsequent conversations during a couple of
drug-filled days, according to the confession and trial testimony.
Jeanette Williams often sat in the next room as the other three
discussed her murder. Williams said he and the victim even slept in
the same bed one night.
After his arrest, Williams calmly told police
that he talked the Gilmores out of two of their plans for killing
Jeanette Williams, including shooting her -- he said the gun would
be too loud -- and taking her out of state for the murder. He
worried they would be more readily connected with her if they
traveled. "I said, `Look, Michelle, let me do my work. Have my money
for me and that will be the end of it,' " Williams told police
afterward. " `Once I take care of my business, if y'all ain't got my
money, then it might be one of y'all being dead, because I don't
play about my money.' " He said last week that he was "high and
drunk" when he went to the police. Williams opted for killing the
victim with a 9-inch steak knife supplied by the Gilmores.
The four
went on a crack-buying expedition in central Houston on March 24,
1997. Michelle Gilmore wheeled Jeanette Williams down the street in
her wheelchair. Richard Williams grabbed the victim's forehead from
behind, slit her throat and, after she fell from her wheelchair,
stabbed her 13 times.
During the killing, the Gilmores drove to
Blueford's house. They told him that Williams was crazy, and that
Williams had murdered Jeanette. They left $400 and told him not to
tell Williams where they had gone. Williams walked back to
Blueford's house and learned the Gilmores had cheated him out of
most of the payment. "When they come back in Texas, I'm going to
bury them," he told police.
During his trial, Williams' attorneys raised the
issue of his intelligence, calling several witnesses who said he
should undergo neurological testing.
But when the prosecutor asked
Dee Dee Halpin, an educational diagnostician testifying for the
defense, if Williams was mentally retarded, she said, "No." She
testified that he scored a 93 on an IQ test when was 6. A bill
before the Texas Legislature, which is trying to make the state's
death penalty law agree with last year's Supreme Court decision,
would classify defendants with an IQ of 70 or below as mentally
retarded. Williams said last week he believes he is mentally
retarded.
His attorney, James Keegan, did not return calls seeking
comment. Prosecutor Lynn Hardaway, who is handling Williams' appeal,
disputed the claim, saying Williams has average to low-average
intelligence.
Noting the number of condemned men who have claimed
mental retardation since the Supreme Court began considering the
issue, Dianne Clements, president of the victims advocacy group
Justice For All, said it has become a "brass ring" for those on
death row. "He and his attorney will grab at whatever straw is
available," she said. But Jim Marcus, executive director of Texas
Defender Service, said the issue of whether Williams is mentally
retarded needs to be examined and that the answer could shift more
culpability to his co-defendants. "One of the traits of mentally
retarded people is that they're very easily led ... or persuaded by
others," Marcus said. "It could be that he's an extremely limited
and vulnerable individual."
But Williams acts tough, boasting that
his gang might kill Blueford for testifying against him. "I am a
gang member and a gang leader," he said, adding that he was in the
West Side Crips and his street name is Panama. "This dude is in fear
(for) his life every day." Later in the interview, Williams said he
told the Crips not to kill Blueford so he would not be blamed for
Blueford's death. "He might turn up dead in a few years," Williams
said, "but I won't have anything to do with it."
UPDATE: Richard Head Williams was contrite and
took responsibility for his crimes in a final statement seconds
before the lethal drugs began flowing into his arms. "I'd like to
apologize for all the pain I've caused," he said. Looking at 3
brothers of his victim, "I'm sorry I caused what happened to your
sister. I apologize." He expressed love to his family and while
acknowledging he made mistakes said, "I was not a monster like they
claimed I was. I made a mistake and this mistake cost - but they
won't cost no more." However, in an interview earlier this month,
Williams said he never saw or knew the victim, Jeanette Williams,
44, and that his criminal past earned him the trip to death row. "The
way I look at it, the whole trial was rehearsed," he said then. "They
used everything I did in my life against me. It had nothing to do
with my case, but that's the way the system is designed, to get
railroaded. I'm just a dumb black man with no money, caught in the
system."
Vanessa Velasquez, the Harris County district
attorney who prosecuted Williams asked, "Then why did he give that
confession? I had hoped he would reconcile with his own guilt.
That's unfortunate. I think he was a cold-blooded killer. He slit a
woman's throat who couldn't walk, was a paraplegic, from ear to ear,
on a dark street," Velasquez said. "She fell out of the chair but
that wasn't enough. He had to continue stabbing her. She was found
laying in the road like a wounded dead animal, with her wheelchair
thrown to the side."
Williams contended, "I ain't did nothing to
nobody," insisting he was in Louisiana at the time of the slaying,
never received any money for the killing and "didn't know no
Gilmores. The whole thing is a setup," he said, also blaming his
earlier incarcerations for "being at the wrong place at the wrong
time. There were cases I had nothing to do with, but I'm not a
snitch," he said. "I wasn't going to rat on anyone." While in prison
with a 10-year term for sexual assault, burglary and arson, records
showed he had more than 100 disciplinary violations, including
assaults and threats on corrections officers. He was discharged Feb.
28, 1997. Jeanette Williams was killed 24 days later.
Texas Killer Executed for Contract Slaying
United Press International
February 26, 2003
HUNTSVILLE, Texas - A Texas death row inmate was
executed Tuesday for stabbing a paralyzed woman to death in a 1997
contract killing in Houston. Richard Williams, 33, was pronounced
dead at 6:19 p.m. after receiving a lethal injection for the murder
of Jeanette Williams. He was hired by a couple to kill the 44-year-old
Williams so they could collect a $25,000 insurance policy.
In his
final statement, Williams apologized to the victim's family. "We
came a long way through the tragedy -- from hate to love and I would
like to apologize for the pain I have caused all my families on both
sides," he said. Three of the victim's brothers were witnesses.
Houston Man Executed Tuesday
By Mark Passwaters -
The Huntsville Item
February 25, 2003
A Houston man sentenced to death for the contract
killing of a paraplegic woman in 1997 was executed Tuesday evening
at the Huntsville "Walls" Unit.
Richard Head Williams, 28, expressed
remorse for the murder of Jeannette Williams, no relation, during
his final statement. "I would like to apologize for the pain I have
caused all my families on both sides," he said. Addressing Frank
Abraham, Jeannette Williams' brother, he said, "I am sorry, brother,
for what happened to your sister and hope that you would forgive me
one day."
Williams had given a number of contradictory
statements regarding his mental condition and role in the killing in
the weeks preceeding his execution, and his contradictions continued
right up to his execution. In a written statement, released after
the execution, Williams was less than contrite. "I could have been
that someone if I (had) been given a chance in life instead of
denial or incarceration every time I was arrested for something the
community believed I did," he said. "To be here on Texas death row
show (sic) all people that we people of American (sic) don't care
about helping. This about destroying lives to show they can kill."
Jeannette Williams was 44 years old and addicted
to crack cocaine when she was murdered on the night of March 24,
1997. Prosecutors say she was killed by Richard Williams as part of
an insurance collection scheme masterminded by Bruce and Michelle
Gilmore, a Houston couple who allowed the paralyzed woman to stay
with them from time to time.
Bruce Gilmore, who had taken out a
$25,000 life insurance policy on Jeannette Williams and named
himself as the sole beneficiary, asked Richard Williams to help kill
the woman in exchange for $12,000. Williams attacked the woman
during an alleged crack buy on a street corner of Houston's Third
Ward. Wielding a nine-inch kitchen knife, Richard Williams slit the
woman's throat, severing her jugular vein and windpipe, and stabbed
her 13 times.
Due to the violence of the attack, Houston police
officers originally thought she had been hit by a truck when they
found her body near her wheelchair.
Richard Williams' execution was the last to be
carried out in Texas this month. Michael Dewayne Johnson, who was
supposed to be executed tonight for the murder of a 27-year-old man
in Lorena in 1995, received a stay Tuesday morning.
Texas Execution Information
Center by David Carson
Txexecutions.org
Richard Head Williams, 43, was executed by lethal
injection on 25 February 2003 in Huntsville, Texas for the contract
killing of a 44-year-old woman.
In March 1997, Bruce and Michelle Gilmore
approached a friend, Jerrol Blueford, about killing Jeanette
Williams, 44. Williams was an acquaintance of the Gilmores and had
lived with them at various times. She was paralyzed and confined to
a wheelchair after being shot by her husband 21 years earlier. She
was also addicted to crack cocaine.
Bruce Gilmore owned a $25,000
life insurance policy on Williams. Blueford declined the Gilmore's
request, but he introduced them to Richard Williams, then 27, a
friend who had just been released from prison and was living with
him. Richard Williams agreed to murder Jeanette Williams (no
relation) for $12,000.
On 24 March 1997, the Gilmores, Richard, and
Jeanette drove to an area near downtown Houston, ostensibly to buy
cocaine. While Bruce Gilmore stayed in the car, Michelle and Richard
pushed Jeanette in her wheelchair toward the corner of the sidewalk.
Richard then grabbed Jeanette's forehead from behind and slit her
throat with a nine-inch steak knife. After she fell from her
wheelchair, Richard repeatedly stabbed her in the chest. Michelle
joined her husband in the car and they drove away, leaving Richard
at the crime scene. They drove to Blueford's house and told him that
Richard Williams had murdered Jeanette. They gave Blueford $400 to
give to Williams and told him not to tell Williams where they were
going.
When Williams returned to Blueford's house, his
hand was wrapped in a blood-soaked towel. He asked Blueford if the
Gilmores had left anything for him. When Blueford gave Williams the
$400, Williams became upset and said that he was going to find and
murder the Gilmores.
Williams had prior convictions for burglary,
arson, and aggravated sexual assault. He was sentenced to four
concurrent 10-year sentences in 1987 at age 17. He never received
parole, due to over 100 disciplinary violations. He was discharged
in February 1997 after completing his term.
A jury convicted Williams in October 1997 of
capital murder and sentenced him to death. The Texas Court of
Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction and sentence in May 1999.
All of his subsequent appeals in state and federal court were denied.
Bruce and Michelle Gilmore were convicted of capital murder and are
serving life prison terms.
"I ain't did nothing to nobody," Williams said in
a death-row interview in the weeks before his execution. Williams
said that he was in Louisiana at the time of the murder, he never
knew or saw the victim, he didn't receive any money, and he "didn't
know no Gilmores." Williams said that he was convicted solely on the
basis of his criminal record. "The way I look at it, the whole trial
was rehearsed," he said. "They used everything I did in my life
against me. ... I'm just a dumb black man with no money, caught in
the system."
In a message posted on an anti-death-penalty web
site, Williams reflected on his lifetime of incarceration in reforms
schools and prisons. "Some might say I was bad," he wrote, "but
really I was confused on what I really wanted in life, where I
wanted to go in this world."
The U.S. Supreme Court denied a request for a
stay from Williams' lawyer, who claimed that his client was mentally
retarded and ineligible for execution according to a recent Supreme
Court ruling. The Court denied this request. At his trial, testimony
showed that Williams' scored 93 on a childhood IQ test, and a
defense expert testified that Williams was not retarded.
Prior to his execution, Williams made a written
statement complaining of the Texas criminal justice system, which he
wrote was "just as crooked as I am said to be." He wrote that he
should have "been given a chance in life instead of denial or
incarceration every time I was arrested for something the community
believed I did." This statement was released after his death.
However, in his verbal last statement, Williams took an apologetic
tone. "I'd like to apologize for all the pain I've caused," he told
his victim's brothers. "I'm sorry I caused what happened to your
sister. I apologize." As he continued his last statement, he
expressed love to his family. He also said, "I was not a monster
like they claimed I was. I made a mistake and this mistake cost --
but they won't cost no more." He gasped and wheezed several times as
the lethal injection began taking effect. He was pronounced dead at
6:19 p.m.
Man Who Cut Throat of Paralyzed Woman Executed
in Texas
By Robert Anthony Phillips -
TheDeathHouse.com
February 25, 2003
HUNTSVILLE, Tex. - A man who cut the throat of a
paralyzed woman in a bizarre contract killing arranged by two of her
"friends" to collect insurance money was executed by lethal
injection Tuesday night. Richard Williams, 33, was pronounced dead
at 6:19 p.m., seven minutes after the lethal dose of chemicals began.
"I'm sorry, brother, for what happened to your sister and I hope
that you would forgive me one day," Williams said before death,
speaking to a member of the victim's family who had come to watch
him die.
Williams requested and ate a final meal
consisting of two chiledogs, two cheeseburgers, a turkey salad,
french fries and ice cream, Michelle Lyons, a spokeswoman for the
Texas Department of Criminal Justice said. Williams had been
sentenced to death after confessing to the March 24, 1977 murder of
Jeanette Williams in Houston. They were not related.
$400 And Death
In a videotaped confession, Williams admitted to
stabbing Jeanette Williams, a 47-year-old paralyzed crack addict, in
the chest and cutting her throat with a steakknife. Jeanette
Williams was in a wheelchair when she was slain. She was addicted to
crack and thought she was being wheeling to an area where she could
buy drugs. Williams said two friends of Jeanette Williams had placed
a $25,000 insurance policy on her life. He said he agreed to kill
the woman to get about $12,000 of the money. But, he got only $400
and a trip to the Death House.
Retardation Claim Dismissed By Courts
The couple who arranged the killing received life
in prison. Williams was released from prison about a month before
the murder. He had served 10 years for burglary, arson and
aggravated sexual assault. Defense lawyers had attempted to get the
courts to block the exeuciton, arguing that Williams was mentally
retarded. In an interview with the Houston Chronicle Williams said
the videotaped confession he gave police was phony, indicating
police had another man pose as him and confess.
Williams became the 298th convicted killer put to
death in the state since 1982.
National Coalition to Abolish
the Death Penalty
Richard Williams (TX) - Feb. 25, 2003
The state of Texas is scheduled to execute
Richard Williams, a black man, Feb. 25 for a 1997 contract killing
in Houston’s Third Ward. He allegedly stabbed Jeannette Abraham
Williams (no relation) for a $400 payoff from Bruce and Michelle
Gilmore.
Williams spent much of his adolescence in reform
schools and prisons, and he regrets his failure to break out of his
life of crime. As an inmate, he has spent much of his time reading
and writing. He reads primarily novels and composes short stories,
songs, and music; he also occasionally draws cartoons. Of his past,
he writes: “I was confused on what I really wanted in life, where I
wanted to go in this world.”
He has a teenage son, Jason, whom he prays for
daily, and has loyal pen pals who he corresponds with regularly. All
too often, states ignore the obvious trauma executions like this
cause children, family members, and friends, and fail to recognize
the second set of victims affected by crimes resulting in the death
penalty. This problem is especially apparent in Texas, which remains
in a league of its own in terms of capital punishment.
Unfortunately, despite a decline from 2001 to
2002 in the other 37 states with death penalty statutes, Texas
nearly doubled its own total from the previous year, recording 33
executions. Early projections indicate that those numbers will only
increase in 2003, and it appears the trend of the Lone Star state
accounting for approximately half the nation’s executions will
continue.
Currently, Texas has 18 pending executions scheduled for
early 2003; the rest of the states and the federal government
combined have only 9 dates set. Williams’ execution, if carried out,
will only continue the dismal legacy of the death penalty in the
state of Texas. Furthermore, Williams stood trial in Harris County –
the state’s, and nation’s leading county in handing down death
sentences.
This execution, if carried out, will further
destroy another family and continue the cycle of violence in Texas
and the United States. Please write Gov. Rick Perry and request
clemency for Richard Williams.
Houston Man Executed For Stabbing Disabled Woman
KSAT-TV 12
AP - February 26, 2003
HUNTSVILLE (AP) - Condemned killer Richard Head
Williams acknowledged his crimes and asked for forgiveness before he
was put to death for fatally slashing and stabbing a wheelchair-bound
woman in Houston less than a month after he got out of prison six
years ago.
In a written statement released after his death Tuesday
night, however, he criticized the Texas criminal justice system for
being "just as crooked as I am said to be." "Now I lay here dead,"
he wrote. "But we have gave all Texans the sign that in some
instances and some cases, 'Killing is alright to do as long it's for
justice of the American people,'" he printed in capital letters. "So
who win? No one do!"
He was more reserved in his spoken words from the
Texas death chamber gurney, apologizing for the pain he caused his
family and saying he was sorry for killing 44-year-old Jeanette
Williams. "I hope you would forgive me one day," he said, looking at
his victim's three brothers, who watched through a window a few feet
away. One of them nodded in agreement.
Seven minutes later, the 33-year-old Williams was
pronounced dead, making him the ninth Texas inmate executed this
year and the third this month.
He already had been convicted of burglary, arson
and sexual assault and had completed a 10-year prison term when he
was sent to death row for killing Jeanette Williams, who was not
related to him.
In recent interviews, he denied any involvement
in the 1997 slaying even though he gave a confession to authorities.
Instead, he said his criminal past was used to convince a jury he
should be sent to death row. "I'm just a dumb black man with no
money, caught in the system," he said. "He essentially lived a life
of crime," said Vanessa Velasquez, the Harris County district
attorney who prosecuted Williams. "From like age 12, he'd been in
trouble all his life."
The murder of Jeanette Williams occurred 24 days
after Williams finished serving nearly all of his 10-year term. "It
almost seemed he wanted to go back," Velasquez said. "He'd become so
institutionalized he wanted to go back, and so to slit somebody's
throat for $300 or $400 was nothing to him."
Williams' attorneys insisted in unsuccessful last-ditch
appeals he was mentally retarded and could not be put to death
because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that barred
execution of the mentally retarded. At his trial, however, testimony
showed his IQ at age 6 was 93, well above the threshold of 70 for
mental retardation. "I'm not the brightest person in the world but
I'm not the dumbest person in the world," Williams said from death
row.
Authorities said Williams was given $400 to kill
Jeanette Williams by a couple who had been caring for her
intermittently and had taken out a $25,000 life insurance policy on
her. Jeanette Williams was a crack addict who was paralyzed after
she was shot by her husband 21 years earlier. Prosecutors said
Richard Williams, who was promised $12,000 for the job, used a 9-inch
steak knife supplied by the couple, Bruce and Michelle Gilmore, to
kill the woman March 24, 1997, as she wheeled down a Houston street.
The Gilmore couple was convicted of capital
murder for their part in the scheme. Each is serving life in prison.
Deathrow.at
Execution date set for February 25, 2003
The state of Texas is scheduled to execute
Richard Williams, a black man, Feb. 25 for a 1997 contract killing
in Houston’s Third Ward. He allegedly stabbed Jeannette Abraham
Williams (no relation) for a $400 payoff from Bruce and Michelle
Gilmore.
Williams spent much of his adolescence in reform
schools and prisons, and he regrets his failure to break out of his
life of crime. As an inmate, he has spent much of his time reading
and writing. He reads primarily novels and composes short stories,
songs, and music; he also occasionally draws cartoons. Of his past,
he writes: “I was confused on what I really wanted in life, where I
wanted to go in this world.”
He has a teenage son, Jason, whom he prays for
daily, and has loyal pen pals who he corresponds with regularly. All
too often, states ignore the obvious trauma executions like this
cause children, family members, and friends, and fail to recognize
the second set of victims affected by crimes resulting in the death
penalty. This problem is especially apparent in Texas, which remains
in a league of its own in terms of capital punishment.
Unfortunately, despite a decline from 2001 to
2002 in the other 37 states with death penalty statutes, Texas
nearly doubled its own total from the previous year, recording 33
executions.
Early projections indicate that those numbers will only
increase in 2003, and it appears the trend of the Lone Star state
accounting for approximately half the nation’s executions will
continue. Currently, Texas has 18 pending executions scheduled for
early 2003; the rest of the states and the federal government
combined have only 9 dates set. Williams’ execution, if carried out,
will only continue the dismal legacy of the death penalty in the
state of Texas. Furthermore, Williams stood trial in Harris County –
the state’s, and nation’s leading county in handing down death
sentences.
This execution, if carried out, will further
destroy another family and continue the cycle of violence in Texas
and the United States. Please write Gov. Rick Perry and request
clemency for Richard Williams.
Hello, I'm Richard. I'm 32 years of age, born on
July 19, 1969. I am a black American, light brown complexion, with
brown eyes, natural blackish-brownish hair. Stand 6'3'', weight 250
lbs. I'm intelligent, funny, honest, talented and like many friends
say - emotionally available. And I'm also very caring to friends.
I'm single, have one child, whom I deeply love
and pray for daily. His name is Jason, age 15. I enjoy reading all
types of books or novels and I also write short stories (mostly
exotic fantasy and urban fiction).
Before my death sentence I was incarcerated
nearly 18 years of my life on and off in different institutions from
reform schools to prisons. Some might say I was bad... But really I
was confused on what I really wanted in life, where I wanted to go
in this world. But I was a true musician, songwriter as will as a
singer - rap entertainer. Also I am a cartoonist.
I have been on Texas death row awaiting execution
for 2 years, 10 months and 4 days [written Aug. 11, 2000]. Spend my
time reading, writing, talking to fellow inmates on row. I love
sports such as baseball, basketball, football, tennis, hockey ect.
I would like to correspond with people of the age
35 to 99, that don't have any problem writing and helping a death
row prisoner.
I'm praying to hear from somebody out there.
Sincerely yours, Richard Earl Head Williams II
Canadian Coalition to Abolish
the Death Penalty
(Williams Homepage)
Hello ! I'm a Black African American, 29 years of
age. Date of birth 07/19/69, 6 ft 3 1/2 inches, 230 lbs, from
Houston, Texas. A high school graduate of '85 from Benjamin Franklin
High in New York. I'm looking for anyone that's willing to write a
prisoner that's interested in a person on death row. My hobbies are:
reading, writing, drawing, songwriting... will answer all letters.
Sincerely yours,
Mr. Richard Earl Head Williams II
# 999251
Polunsky Unit D.R
Ex Parte Richard Head Williams
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS FROM
HARRIS COUNTY
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
February 26, 2003
Excerpt From Concurring Opinion - In my opinion,
an applicant must, at a bare minimum, provide evidence of at least
one I.Q. test (preferably taken before the age of 18) from which a
reasonable trier of fact could conclude that the person is mentally
retarded under Atkins. Better yet is evidence of several such I.Q.
tests, coupled with supporting school and medical records, and
record evidence or affidavits from qualified experts (or laymen with
sufficient personal knowledge of specific conduct) that at least
raise an issue concerning applicant's lack of adaptive skills and
the onset of mental retardation before age 18.
In the present case, I conclude that applicant
has failed to meet that threshold factual burden. The evidence he
has submitted shows:
When applicant was in the first grade, his
Slosson I.Q. tested at 93. In 1981, his verbal I.Q. tested at 65,
his performance I.Q. at 85, and his full score I.Q. at 72. In 1982,
applicant's I.Q. score (WISC-R) increased to Verbal 68; Performance
96; Full Scale 80. The assessment at that time, when applicant was
in the 6th grade, was "intellectual functioning in the low average
range. Significant discrepancy in development of his nonverbal
intelligence. Characterized as a visual learner. Academic
achievement (esp. in reading) below intellectual functioning."
When applicant was 14, every teacher noted poor
or very poor attendance. One stated that he "has the ability to
learn but needs much individualized personal instruction and
attention." Another stated that "when in attendance [he] was making
a passing grade ... If Richard would stay in attendance he would
average a C or B for a nine weeks period." It was also noted that
applicant had "poor peer relationships," "defies authority," and "leaves
home but never arrives at school."
In 1984, when applicant was 15 and charged with
burglary of a coin-operated machine, he was given a psychological
assessment. The examiner stated: "Richard [applicant] is functioning
in the borderline range of intellectual ability as assessed by the
Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test on which he obtained an IQ of 72."
At that time, applicant was in regular 8th grade
classes but was expelled for fighting. The examiner stated that
applicant's poor performance in reading and spelling "show a lack of
ability to use phonetics, i.e. to sound out words. Consequently he
reads entirely by sight and his sight vocabulary is very small." The
examiner also stated that "[p]rojective tests and clinical
impressions indicate that [applicant] is an immature boy who wants
and needs positive relationships with others." Applicant also felt "overcontrolled
or caged in by his parents" and "seems to perceive his mother as
negatively controlling and withdrawn." In the "Conclusions" section
of his report, the examiner does not mention any mental deficiencies,
but rather focuses on the fact that applicant's needs were not being
met at home and thus outside placement was recommended to provide "support
and consistent limits which are enforced in a non-reactive, calm
fashion."
In 1985, the Texas Youth Commission retested
applicant and he again obtained a 72 Peabody "full score I.Q." It
was noted that applicant made "minimal effort" during the testing.
When applicant attended Crockett State School
under the control of the Texas Youth Commission, his school work
improved dramatically: he made A's in Math, B's in Survival Skills,
English/Language Arts and P.E., and C's in Social Studies and Health.
He tested in the 53rd percentile on the TONI test of Non-Verbal
Intelligence.
In 1985, applicant was placed in Vocational
Education for the Handicapped classes at Wheatley High School, where
he received mainly A's and B's and his teacher reported applicant
had a "generally positive and serious approach to schoolwork" and
that "a lot of good things are waiting for [applicant's] positive
influence out there." Despite these improvements, applicant dropped
out of school three months later.
According to a defense psychologist expert who
testified at applicant's capital murder trial, applicant suffered
from developmental delay, a learning disability (dyslexia) and
impaired motor function. By the time of his capital murder trial, he
also had some possible brain dysfunction.
This evidence certainly supports a conclusion
that applicant has dyslexia- a learning disability- which has
adversely affected his reading abilities, as well as his ability to
score well on the verbal component of an I.Q. test. But dyslexia is
not mental retardation. Applicant's factual allegations and writ
materials also support a conclusion that applicant is not well-educated,
has poor motor skills, some possible brain dysfunction, and has not
shown much interest in education during his youth (except for a
short period during and after his stay at TYC when he improved
dramatically), but none of this constitutes "sufficient specific
facts" to support a claim of mental retardation under Atkins.