Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Craig Chandler
PRICE
A.K.A.: "The Warwick Slaher" - "Iron Man"
Classification: Juvenile serial killer
Characteristics: Juvenile (13)
Number of victims: 4
Date of murders: 1987 / 1989
Date of birth: 1974
Victims profile: Rebecca Spencer,
27 /
Joan Heaton, 39, and her daughters,
Jennifer 10, and Melissa 8
Method of murder: Stabbing
with knife
Location: Warwick, Rhode Island, USA
Status: Sentenced 29 years to the jail during
various sentences from 1991 to 2007
Craig Price
is a juvenile serial killer from Buttonwoods neighbourhoods of Warwick,
Rhode Island.
At a minor age of 13 in 1987, Craig Price murdered
neighbor Rebecca Spencer, a 27-year-old mother of two, by stabbing her
58 times.
Two years later in 1989, Craig Iron Man Price
butchered another neighbor Joan Heaton with 63 times and two of her
young daughters using the kitchen knives.
In a nonchalant, matter-of-fact drawl he described
the night of terror in the Heaton home. He told how he bit Heaton's face
as he knifed her. He mimicked the last sounds of the dying girls.
Craig Price was sentenced 29 years to the jail during
various sentences from 1991 to 2007. He will be sealed in the jail until
at least 2020, at the time he will be 46.
Craig Chandler Price
The youngest U.S. serial killer of the
Archives, Craig was known as the "Slasher of Warwick" after a
brutal series of killings in Rhode Island in the late 1980s.
Craig, a
black youth from a working class family, is believed to have committed
his first murder when he was only 13. The victim was a white female from
his neighborhood, whom he "peeped" on dozens of occasions. He
stabbed her to death with one of her kitchen knives after breaking into
her house.
The murder went unsolved until a few
months after Craig's second killing frenzy which took place almost 2
years later, when he was 15. The victims were a white female and her two
daughters.
The slashings were so similar to his first known kill that
the FBI was called in to profile a serial killer. They failed to finger
a 15 year old black male as their suspect. It took an observant
detective who noticed Craig with a big cut on his hand to crack the
case.
He admitted to committing the murders without any persuasion and,
according to the FBI, goes down in history as the youngest serial killer
in US history.
Craig is scheduled to be released from
the ACI in Cranston, Rhode Island, in 1998. His sentence for murder
having been served, he is now doing 2 additional years for contempt. Not
a model prisoner Craig now faces an additional twenty years in prison
for crimes committed while incarcerated.
The lethal teenager is also a
suspect in other unsolved homicides around RI. The FBI and local
authorities believe it is only a matter of time that Craig will start
killing again.
Craig Price
(also known as the Warwick Slasher, born 1974) is a serial killer
from Warwick, Rhode Island. He was arrested in 1989 for four murders
committed in his neighborhood: A woman and her two daughters that year,
and the murder of another woman two years prior. He had a previous
criminal record for petty theft.
After he was discovered, Price calmly confessed to
his crimes. Arrested a month before his 16th birthday, he was tried and
convicted as a minor. By law, this meant that he would be released and
his criminal records sealed as soon as he turned 21. Price bragged that
he would "make history" when he was released.
The case led to changes in state law to allow
juveniles to be tried as adults for serious crimes, but these could not
be applied retroactively to Price.
Due to the brutality of his crimes and the opinion of
state psychologists that he was a poor candidate for rehabilitation, a
group called Citizens Opposed to the Release of Craig Price formed to
lobby for his continued imprisonment. Price was charged with a variety
of crimes, including criminal contempt for refusing a psychological
evaluation, extortion for threatening a corrections officer, and assault
and violation of probation for fights while in prison
He was sentenced to an additional 10–25 years,
depending on his cooperation with treatment.
Price maintains that he has paid his debt to society,
and that he is being kept in jail partially due to racism.
Prison violence
On July 29, 2009, Price was involved in a prison
fight with another inmate. While trying to break up the fight, one of
the correctional officers was stabbed in the finger by a handmade shank
in Price's possession. In the wake of the prison fight, Price has been
transferred to another facility. An officer from the Rhode Island
Department of Corrections said Price has been booked twice for fighting
since leaving the Adult Correctional Institutions in Cranston. Price was
recently denied parole in March and his current good time release date
is in April 2020. Wall, however, said that date may change after his
recent behavior.
Wikipedia.org
Juvenile Serial Killer Remains in
Prison
By Helen O'Neill - San Francisco Chronicle
Saturday, December 15, 2007
They called him Iron Man, a hulking teenage football
player with a baby face and winsome smile who lived with his parents in
a small ranch house in the Buttonwoods section of town.
Then, one summer night in 1987, Craig Price crept
across his neighbor's yard, broke into a little brown house on Inez
Avenue and stabbed Rebecca Spencer 58 times. She was a 27-year-old
mother of two. He was 13.
Two years passed before Price struck again.
Joan Heaton, 39, was butchered with the kitchen
knives she had bought earlier that day. The bodies of her daughters,
Jennifer 10, and Melissa 8, were found in pools of blood, pieces of
knives broken off in their bones; Jennifer had been stabbed 62 times.
Buttonwoods was paralyzed. Police combed the streets.
Neighbors padlocked their doors. The Heaton house was just a few hundred
yards from the Spencer home and the question hung thick over the tidy,
working-class neighborhood: What kind of monster was living in their
midst?
The answer came two weeks later.
Price was a wisecracking 15-year-old who had been in
minor trouble for petty burglaries — "thieving" he called it — but who
seemed friendly to neighbors and was always surrounded by friends.
Police had become suspicious after Price lied about a
deep gash on his finger. They knew from the crime scene that the killer
had cut himself. A bloody sock-print matched Price's size-13 feet. They
found the knives in his backyard shed.
At the police station, his mother sobbing softly
beside him, Price calmly confessed to the four murders.
Yet even as police and prosecutors celebrated the
capture of Rhode Island's most notorious serial killer, they were
reminded of a grim reality.
In five years, Price would be free to kill again.
Price was a month shy of his 16th birthday. As a
juvenile, he would be released from the youth correctional center when
he turned 21 — the maximum penalty under Rhode Island law at the time.
His records would be sealed. The 5-foot-10 inch, 240-pound killer would
be free to resume his life as if the murders had never occurred.
The law was on his side and Price knew it.
"When I get out I'm going to smoke a bomber," Price
yelled to the crowd, as he was led, handcuffed, from the courthouse.
Jeffrey Pine, then assistant attorney general, said
he had never felt such frustration or disgust. "There was something
fundamentally wrong with a system that allowed someone who killed four
people to simply go free at 21," Pine said.
And so Pine and others embarked on a remarkable
mission. They would change the system so that future young murderers
could be locked up for life. At the same time they would do their best
to ensure that Price himself would stay behind bars long past his 21st
birthday.
It was an extraordinary response to an extraordinary
case and it involved every level of government, from the governor's and
attorney general's offices to the state legislature, the police and the
courts.
In effect, the legal system would bend the laws it
was sworn to uphold because, despite misgivings by some, many believed
that keeping Price behind bars was simply the right thing to do.
*****
Even today, Price's taped confession sounds
chillingly surreal. In a nonchalant, matter-of-fact drawl he describes
the night of terror in the Heaton home. He tells how he bit Heaton's
face as he knifed her. He mimics the last sounds of the dying girls. He
whines about cutting his hand.
Detective Tim Colgan, who took Price's confession,
went home that night and cried. Colgan had been first on the scene.
Never had he witnessed such savagery. Nor such lack of remorse.
Detective Kevin Collins, who assisted with the
confession, had never felt such rage. He vowed to do everything in his
power to prevent Price from ever walking free.
For years, that is what he did.
With members of the victims' families, he formed
Citizens Opposed to the Release of Craig Price, or CORP. He organized
rallies, launched fundraisers, appeared on national news shows and in
publications: Larry King Live, Time, Newsweek. CORP hired planes to fly
banners in major cities around the country declaring "Killer Craig Price.
Moving to your city? Beware."
Every time the name Craig Price surfaced, so did the
earnest, angry face of a seasoned police officer warning the nation
about the murderer who had terrorized his town.
"Craig Price is a serial killer stopped temporarily
at four killings," he said. "He should be locked up for life."
Many in the state agreed. Within a month of Price's
arrest, the state legislature passed a law allowing juveniles to be
tried in adult court for serious crimes. The same measure had failed on
two previous occasions.
But the law couldn't be applied retroactively to
Price. Collins and Pine knew they needed to do more.
Pine's chance came when he was elected attorney
general in 1992.
He pushed for legislation to allow judges to consider
criminal records in deciding whether someone should be committed to a
psychiatric hospital. Known as the Craig Price Bill, it passed in 1994.
He flew to the FBI Academy in Quantico, Va., to seek
the advice of Greg McCrary, a national expert on serial killers. McCrary
had profiled hundreds of murderers. But rarely had he encountered anyone
as violent as Price. Less than 1 percent of killers are that frenzied,
he told Pine. And, so far, society has found no way to treat them.
In a detailed report, McCrary described Price as a
human predator who showed no empathy or remorse and was highly likely to
kill again. State psychologists were saying the same thing.
Nothing in Price's background explained his rage. By
all accounts he was from a stable home where both parents worked to
provide a comfortable life for their children.
Wesley Profit, a Massachusetts psychiatrist who
examined Price on behalf of the state, wrote in 1990 that Price was a
serial killer who was "in a psychotic rage at the time of the murders."
He is "in dire need of extensive treatment," Profit continued, "and even
then may not be in a position to be safely placed in the community."
The reports were more tools for the state, Pine said.
"We were looking at everything."
*****
In many ways, the best tool turned out to be Price
himself.
On the advice of his court-appointed lawyer, Price
refused a court order to undergo further psychological testing, fearing
the results would be used to commit him for life. His refusals allowed
Pine's office to file contempt-of-court charges in 1994. When Price flew
into a rage and threatened to "snuff out" a corrections officer, Pine
seized the opportunity to file extortion charges.
It was an extraordinary indictment. No one could
remember an inmate being charged for what many considered routine
language in the youth prison.
"We were dealing with a quadruple murderer who had
threatened to kill again," Pine said, "And we were going to prosecute
him to the full extent of the law."
But he was also dealing with a growing public demand
for action, fueled by fear of Price's imminent release. Price's 21st
birthday was on Oct. 11, 1994.
Media reports describing the young killer's life
behind bars stoked the fear. There were stories about how Price had
beefed up to 300 pounds by lifting weights, how he had made a
controversial rap video about killing a cop, how he boasted freely about
"making history" when he was released.
Even President Clinton couldn't avoid the furor
surrounding Price. In May 1994 when Clinton flew to Providence he was
greeted by demonstrators holding banners demanding that the "Warwick
Slasher" remain locked up. Pressed in a television interview, Clinton
said he thought it was "outrageous that this kid could get out."
Gov. Bruce Sundlun was saying the same thing.
"Everyone in state government shares your concerns,"
he told the crowd at a candlelit vigil outside Warwick City Hall in June
1994. "Everyone in state government wants to blow out the candle on
Craig Price and keep him behind bars."
But the state still had to figure out ways to do so.
A major test was the extortion trial.
Patrick Youngs, who prosecuted the case and still
works in the attorney general's office, remembers hyperventilating as he
waited for the verdict. It was days before Price's 21st birthday. The
whole state was watching. Television stations were cutting into soap
operas to report the outcome. Youngs knew the judge would not be swayed
by public pressure. And he knew he had a very weak case.
By now Price had a new lawyer, Robert Mann, one of
the state's most respected civil rights advocates with a reputation for
taking on tough cases. In court, Mann accused the attorney general's
office of twisting the laws to selectively prosecute Price. The state
was essentially using two sets of laws, he argued, one for everyone else
and one for Price.
But Price sealed his own fate. Found guilty by a jury,
he delivered a belligerent, rambling diatribe about how he had paid his
dues to society and how he was now being persecuted because of his race.
"The media has once again done a good job of creating a monster," he
said, his voice thundering through the stunned courtroom. "Not just a
bogeyman, but a black bogeyman."
"The judge got a glimpse," Youngs said. "And that was
all he needed."
Price was sentenced to 15 years, seven to serve and
eight suspended. He spent his 21st birthday in the Adult Correctional
Institution.
Citizens Opposed to the Release of Craig Price spent
it at a candlelit vigil at the state house.
*****
"The test of the system is not whether some middle-class
white kid caught with an ounce of marijuana gets a fair shake," Mann
says. "The test is whether someone portrayed as larger than life evil
gets a fair shake."
There was no doubt that Price tested the limits of
the system.
"People said we bent the system," Youngs said. "We
didn't. We did our best within the rules."
For more than a decade, the state continued to find
creative ways way to charge and convict Price. The criminal contempt
charge stemming from Price's earlier refusals to submit to psychiatric
testing went forward — and brought a one-year sentence — even though, on
the advice of Mann, Price had since agreed to the tests. Fights in
prison led to assault charges. The state even took the unusual step of
charging Price with violation of probation while he was in prison.
Every conviction added more time. And every
conviction brought more headlines about the state's tireless efforts to
protect the public from Craig Price.
Several appeals went to the state Supreme Court.
Always, Price lost.
Mann wasn't the only one who questioned the lengths
to which the state went. Mental health advocates had bitterly opposed
the law allowing courts to consider criminal records in commitment
proceedings. The state branch of the American Civil Liberties Union
consistently criticized the state's tactics.
"The pressure that was brought to bear to keep him in
prison is the same pressure that condemns innocent people to prison and
to death," Steven Brown, the branch's executive director, said in 1994.
Yet lawmakers, prosecutors and judges were faced with
an agonizing dilemma: What should society do with a psychopathic killer
it cannot legally lock up for life?
In May 1997 Price appeared before Chief District
Court Judge Albert DeRobbio after a jury convicted him of criminal
contempt. Three years earlier DeRobbio had sentenced Price to one year
for the same charge, believing it was the maximum he could impose.
Subsequently the Supreme Court ruled that judges had unlimited
sentencing power in such cases.
At 77 and still head of the District Court, DeRobbio
is the respected elder statesman of the Rhode Island judiciary. From his
courtroom on Dorrance Street, DeRobbio has handed down thousands of
sentences and seen his share of murderers.
The Price sentencing, he says, was the most difficult
decision of his career.
Contempt charges usually result in a fine, not jail
time. Yet the state was begging DeRobbio to put Price away for life.
DeRobbio could weigh public health and safety, but
not public fear. He could take into account the murders, but he could
not sentence Price for those crimes.
"I did not feel that I could, in conscience, sentence
him to life on a contempt charge," DeRobbio said.
And so he gave 25 years, 10 to serve and the
remaining 15 years if Price got into trouble or refused treatment.
"I felt that to put him on hold for 25 years would be
to put a hold on many, many things," DeRobbio said. "And maybe, in that
time, some form of treatment could be found."
*****
Price has written many letters over the years, to
judges and prison officials and the media, complaining about his
incarceration. Long ago, he says, he paid his debt for his juvenile
crimes.
"The state was effectively organized not to
rehabilitate me, but to incarcerate me," Price said in court in 2004. "They
were looking for anything to lock me up."
Many felt that was true, but that the state had no
other choice.
"We had a unique combination of the state's most
heinous crime committed by one of its youngest criminals," Pine says. "It
was a chaotic, emotional time, and I think we did a good job of making
the system work."
There is no doubt that Price left a lasting legacy on
the juvenile justice system in Rhode Island. Today, a 15-year-old serial
killer would immediately be referred to adult court, and likely
sentenced to life without parole.
There are currently 10 juveniles imprisoned or
awaiting trial in the Adult Correctional Center.
Price himself ended up in court many more times — for
assault, violation of probation, and various appeals. In 2004 he was
transferred to the Florida Department of Corrections as part of a
routine interstate transfer. Florida prison officials refused to allow
him to be interviewed, citing "security reasons."
Price's current scheduled release date is December
2020. He will be 46.
Craig
Price: Confessions of a teenage serial killer
By Rachael Bell
The Heaton Murders
On September 4, 1989, Marie Bouchard went to check on
her daughter Joan Heaton, 39, and her two grandchildren, Jennifer, 10,
and Melissa, 8, at their home on Metropolitan Drive in the Buttonwoods
area of Warwick, R.I. She was concerned because she hadn't heard from
them over the Labor Day weekend. Marie's other daughter, Mary Lou,
accompanied her to Joan's house. It was a visit that would change their
lives forever.
When Marie and Mary Lou went to the house, they found
it unusual that no one answered the door when they called. They knew
Joan must have been nearby because her car was still parked in the
driveway, so they rang the doorbell several more times. Still, there was
no answer. They decided to take a look inside the house.
When they entered, they immediately
knew something was terribly wrong. The interior was splattered with
blood and a putrid smell permeated the air. As they walked further into
the house, they made a heart-wrenching discovery.
They saw Joan lying beneath blood-soaked sheets in
the hallway. Her oldest daughter, Jennifer, was lying nearby and Melissa
was on the kitchen floor. All three had been brutally murdered.
Marie and Mary Lou were horror stricken. Just days
earlier Marie had spent the day with Joan and her grandchildren shopping
and enjoying time together. It was hard to imagine that they were all
dead.
The mother and daughter called the police soon after
they discovered the bodies. Within moments, rescue workers arrived on
the scene followed shortly thereafter by detectives. The house was
cordoned off and an investigation of the crime scene began.
Detectives were shocked at the savagery of the crime.
Even the most seasoned investigators had difficulty holding back tears.
All the victims had been stabbed multiple times with kitchen knives. The
youngest child, Melissa, was stabbed so fiercely that one of the blades
actually broke off in her neck. She also had her skull bashed in with a
kitchen stool. Apart from the 57 stab wounds inflicted on her body, Joan
was also bludgeoned and strangled. It was believed that they were
murdered three days prior to the discovery.
Detectives were shocked at the savagery of the crime.
Even the most seasoned investigators had difficulty holding back tears.
All the victims had been stabbed multiple times with kitchen knives. The
youngest child, Melissa, was stabbed so fiercely that one of the blades
actually broke off in her neck. She also had her skull bashed in with a
kitchen stool. Apart from the 57 stab wounds inflicted on her body, Joan
was also bludgeoned and strangled. It was believed that they were
murdered three days prior to the discovery.
Looking for Leads
The Warwick Police Department had their finest
working on the case. They were determined to catch the person
responsible for the murders and they worked day and night reviewing
evidence and interviewing locals who might have information related to
the crime. They also enlisted one of the FBI's top profilers, Gregg O.
McCrary, to assist in the investigation.
McCrary stated in his book The Unknown Darkness,
that he believed the murderer was likely someone from the Heaton's
neighborhood. Moreover, he suggested the crime was probably connected
with another unsolved murder that took place two years earlier in
Buttonwoods. The coincidences between the crimes were significant.
In July 1987, Rebecca Spencer, 27, was found dead in
her living room. She had been stabbed repeatedly with a packing knife.
At the time of her death she was preparing to move to another
neighborhood.
In both the Heaton and the Spencer cases, the killer
used a weapon that was already present in the house. This presented
strong evidence that the killer originally entered the residence for
another purpose, such as to burglarize the house. It is likely that the
intruder was caught unaware and murdered the eyewitnesses using what
McCrary referred to as a "weapon of opportunity."
Robbers often burglarize houses they know. The more
familiar you are with the contents of a house, the more successful your
robbery will be. Consequently, burglars regularly choose to rob houses
that are close to where they live. McCrary suggested that in both cases
the murderer likely entered the residences with the intention of robbing
and probably was familiar with the houses and/or residents. Moreover, he
believed the murderer lived in the Buttonwoods area because both crimes
were committed five houses from one another.
Another similarity between the cases was an unusual
display of "overkill." Joan and Rebecca were stabbed approximately 60
times each, and the children approximately 30 times. Due to the
excessive nature of the crimes, it was highly probable that the same
person committed the murders.
McCrary suggested to investigators that the "frenetic
manner of the stabbing," used to kill the Heatons likely resulted in the
murderer stabbing his own hand. He told them that they should look for
someone in the neighborhood with a cut or bandaged hand. McCrary's
advice was of great use to investigators because it significantly
narrowed the search for a suspect. They had a location in which to begin
and a possible characteristic of the suspect. All they needed was some
luck.
Breakthrough
On September 5, 1989, just one day after the bodies
were discovered, investigators got their first real break in the case.
According to Denise Lang's book, A Call for Justice, police
detectives Ray Pendergast and Mark Brandreth were driving through a park
near Buttonwoods, "when Pendergast spotted a familiar face." They
stopped the car to talk to a neighborhood boy named Craig Price, 15, who
Pendergast once coached in a local basketball program.
Pendergast asked the youth if he heard about the
murders. Craig responded with concern that he was aware of what had
happened and that he had seen the bodies coming out of the house the day
before. He lived just a few doors away from the Heaton family.
During the conversation, Pendergast and Brandreth
noticed that Craig had a bandage on his hand. Suspicious, Pendergast
asked how he hurt himself. Craig claimed that he got drunk several
nights earlier and punched his hand through a car window on
Keeley Avenue. As the detectives pulled away
they could not help but wonder if Craig was telling the truth about his
hand. Why would he admit to two police officers that he vandalized a car?
It seemed unlikely that a teenager would commit such
ghastly crimes as the Heaton murders, let alone such a good-humored and
vivacious kid as Craig. However, the fact that the boy had a cut on his
hand and lived on the same street as the Heatons was too much of a
coincidence to ignore. It was something both officers felt compelled to
follow up on, which they did.
The detectives wrote up a report and began to
investigate Craig's story. They learned that there was no police report
of a car window being smashed in the area Craig mentioned. They also
went to Keeley Avenue and found no evidence of
glass on the street. The two detectives began to further doubt Craig's
story.
Craig became a viable suspect in the Heaton murders.
Even though many in the department believed the officers were wasting
their time investigating him, Pendergast and Brandreth decided to follow
their gut feelings and pursue Craig as a lead. They just needed more
evidence to support their theory.
In the meantime, expert blood analyst Dr. Henry Lee
was contacted by police and asked to examine the Heatons' residence for
clues. He went to the house and analyzed the blood splatters and trails.
During his investigation, he gathered vital clues from the crime scene
including a bloody sock imprint. Whoever left the imprint wore a size 13
shoe.
Suspect
Craig Price was not an average teenager. At age 15,
he already had a history of offenses including a record of breaking and
entering, theft, peeping into houses and using drugs. He was also known
to have a violent temper. Police had been called to his house on more
than one occasion to settle disputes in which he was involved.
Investigators working on the Heaton case decided it
was time to question Craig more thoroughly. They went to Craig's house
and asked him to come with his parents to the police station, which they
did. During questioning, Craig was asked more detailed questions about
how he cut his hand. He maintained his story that he hurt himself while
trying to break into a car. Investigators were not convinced and asked
him to take a lie-detector test.
The following day, Craig submitted to a polygraph. He
was asked questions relating to how he cut his hand. The test revealed
that Craig was lying. According to Lang, "it was the first big break in
the case."
Even though the polygraph proved that Craig was
dishonest, however, it didn't prove that he was involved in the murders.
Investigators needed more evidence.
During interviews with Craig's friends and
acquaintances, investigators learned that he ran with a gang of juvenile
delinquents who were known to burglarize houses. More significantly,
they discovered that Craig boasted about killing Rebecca Spencer. It was
the first evidence they had connecting Craig to a murder. Investigators
were quick to obtain a search warrant for his house.
Detectives Kevin Collins, Arthur Anderson and Tim
Colgan organized a search team. They devised a plan to set up overnight
surveillance of the house before actually going in to search the
residence. They wanted to make sure Craig was there and didn't leave the
premises.
In the early morning hours of September 17,
detectives gave the signal to move in on the house. A team of officers
led by Collins, Anderson and Colgan rang the doorbell. Craig's father
answered the door and was shocked to see the police on his doorstep. He
had no choice but to let them in.
The rest of the family, including Craig, his mother
and brother were awakened and asked to sit in the living room during the
search. They were all visibly distressed by the drama, except for Craig
who dozed off to sleep on the couch. It didn't take investigators long
to find what they were looking for.
While searching the shed behind the house, a trash
bag was found full of incriminating evidence. Within the bag were
several bloody knives from the Heaton household, along with bloodied
articles of clothing, gloves and other objects. Investigators woke up
Craig and arrested him for the murders of Joan, Jennifer and Melissa.
Surprisingly, he seemed unaffected.
Craig was ushered from his house to the police
station with his parents in tow. He was booked, then interrogated about
the murders. The detectives hoped Craig would come clean about his
crimes. They got more than expected.
Craig's Confessions
During the interview, Craig amazed detectives when he
immediately confessed to the Heaton murders. He described in detail the
events of the fateful night, although his story periodically changed.
Eventually, he became worn out and decided that it was easier to tell
the truth. According to Lang, "what came out of his mouth next stunned
even the most experienced and jaded listeners and sent his father, John
Price, to the men's room to vomit, rendering him unable to return."
Craig's horrified mother stood by her son as he
recounted the events that took place at the Heaton residence
approximately two weeks earlier. He told his interrogators that his
primary intention was to burglarize the house. He said that he found an
open window in the kitchen, which he crawled through. He accidentally
landed on a table, which broke but, despite the noise, he continued in
the burglary.
He claimed that he walked through the residence
looking for items to steal. He didn't realize that the noise had
awakened Joan. She walked into the kitchen and spotted Craig when she
turned on the light. In a state of panic, Craig said that he grabbed
Joan, then beat and strangled her. Joan's screams woke up the children
who stumbled out of their beds to the hallway. Melissa ran to the
kitchen to call the police but Craig overpowered her.
Craig tackled the girls to the floor, then went to
the kitchen, grabbed some knives and began to stab them all. During the
attack, one of the girls bit Craig's hand. In a fit of rage, he bit the
girl back on the face. Craig also bit Joan. Moreover, he smashed the
youngest girl over the head with a stool, when she continued to struggle
against him. Craig didn't expect that the three would put up such a
fight, but they did. They fought until they succumbed to their injuries.
Craig said that during the murders he had
accidentally stabbed his hand. He removed the gloves he was wearing and
tended to his injuries in the bathroom. He didn't realize that he left a
trail of blood and sock prints behind him.
Evidence collected from the crime scene was later
found to support Craig's story. The blood analysis conducted by Dr. Lee
showed that some of the blood samples matched Craig's blood type.
Moreover, Craig's shoe size was the same as the sock prints. There was
no doubt he was telling the truth.
Craig further admitted to covering the Heatons'
bodies with blankets, probably out of shame for what he had done. He
then tried to clean up the crime scene with towels but he feared that if
he stayed too long police would catch him. He quickly gathered the
knives, gloves and some of the bloodied towels and sprinted from the
scene.
Craig said he immediately returned to his home
several doors away. He confessed that he hid his blood-soaked clothes in
a bag in the attic. Detectives were alerted to the evidence and later
found the bag in the precise location where Craig said it could be found.
Following Craig's detailed account of the Heaton
murders, he surprised detectives again. When asked about Rebecca Spencer,
Craig admitted that he also killed her. He was just 13 years old at the
time.
Craig had no difficulty remembering his first murder.
He provided investigators with details of the night in question, while
showing little remorse for what he had done. After his confession, a
wave of disgust mixed with relief passed over the detectives. Four
murders solved within the space of several hours was a rare break.
Investigators working on the case were glad they
finally had their man. They just hoped Craig would get what he deserved
for the atrocities he committed, preferably a very long prison sentence.
They would have a long wait.
Slipping Under the Wire
Craig Price had the law on his side. Despite the
brutal murders he committed, Craig would never have to face a trial or
serve prison time because he confessed to his crimes just weeks before
his 16th birthday. According to
Rhode Island
state law, all the courts could do was hold him in a training school
until his 21st birthday and no longer. Thus after five years,
Craig would be a free man with a clean record.
The thought of Craig serving only five years for four
brutal murders enraged the citizens of
Rhode Island, especially the families of the
victims. It was obvious that the law was working against them. However,
at the time of Craig's offense, teenage serial killers below the age of
16 were a rare phenomenon. In fact, Craig was considered to be one of
the country's youngest serial killers.
Even though Craig could not be tried for the murders,
he still had to undergo a court hearing before he could be placed in the
training school. On September 21, 1989 Craig appeared before Judge
Carmine R. DiPetrillo at the Kent County Courthouse. During the brief
proceedings, Craig was presented with the murder and burglary charges
against him, to which he pleaded guilty.
Craig was ordered to serve five years at the
Rhode IslandTraining School's
Youth Correctional Center (YCC), a maximum-security detention facility.
He was also ordered to undergo intense psychological examination and
therapy. However, Craig refused treatment. Moreover, he refused to
officially discuss the murders at all by pleading the Fifth Amendment.
Craig withdrew from the diagnostic and treatment
program arranged by the judge on the advice of his lawyers. According to
court documents, the reasoning behind the decision was based on fears
that the psychiatric examination might, "result in his being placed in a
psychiatric facility for commitment beyond his twenty-first birthday."
Despite court intervention, Craig stuck to his guns and refused to
submit to any psychological measures.
In the meantime, Craig carried on with life within
the institution. He completed his high school equivalency test and began
taking satellite college courses. He believed he needed to improve
himself academically so that he could get a good job when he was let out
of the YCC.
By 1993, Craig developed a reputation for good
behavior within the training school, despite the fact that he refused
treatment. In fact, he was in such good standing that his superiors
granted him permission to counsel other youths at the facility. Moreover,
Gina Macris suggested in a 1993 article in The Providence Journal
that Craig also performed light security duties, which included
patrolling the school's hallways. Craig was even allowed to make a rap
video at the school, which included threatening lyrics.
When the news broke of Craig's special treatment at
the facility, Rhode Island citizens and
the families of the victims demanded that it be stopped. After much
protest it ended, but the bigger problem still remained. Time was
running short and Craig's release date was steadily approaching. There
was less than one and a half years to work out a way to prevent him from
being freed.
The Campaign
Four figures were instrumental in the campaign to
stop Craig's release. They were Joan Heaton's mother, Marie; her sister,
Mary Lou; Capt. Kevin Collins, who led the Heaton investigation; and
Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Pine. From the beginning, they
lobbied the Rhode Island
legislature to institute new bills to prevent Craig's release and others
like him. Moreover, they went out of their way to inform the world of
Craig's crimes and his upcoming release. Together, they tried every
possible avenue to prevent Craig from having the chance to murder again.
In 1990, Pine and Collins were key figures in
instigating the passing of the O'Neil bill, which toughened sentences on
teenage murderers. In 1993, Pine introduced a controversial bill that
would give the Office of the Attorney General the power to civilly
commit a mentally ill individual to a mental institution if the person
posed a danger to society. Many thought the bill would discriminate
against the mentally ill and give those with psychological problems a
bad name. It was also argued that the bill specifically targeted Craig
and could be used to prevent him from ever being freed.
Pine stood his ground. His main interest was making
sure Craig stayed locked up for as long as possible. Lang quoted Pine as
saying, "I will do everything I can to prevent another tragedy." Much to
his delight and that of the families of the victims, the Craig Price
Bill was passed that same year. It was a huge step, which they hoped
would result in Craig being forced to submit to a psychiatric diagnostic
and treatment program.
In October 1993, Collins organized Citizens Opposed
to the Release of Price (CORP). The nonprofit organization concentrated
on raising funds that would be used to increase public awareness about
Craig's crimes and assist with lobbying efforts. The goal was to get
critical bills passed that would prevent Craig from being released.
Marie and Mary Lou also helped lead the growing
campaign. They traveled throughout the state alerting the general public
about Craig's upcoming release. According to a Time article by
Jill Smolowe, the group worked endlessly, rallying to get funding,
petitions signed and information to the public, hoping to "make Price's
name a household word." Within months the organization attracted
hundreds of volunteers, raised tens of thousands of dollars and gained
national attention.
In the interim, Craig was preparing himself to begin
a new life. By the end of the year he had already been ordered on six
occasions to adhere to mandatory psychiatric evaluations and therapy.
Nonetheless, he continued to refuse for fear that he would be forced
into a mental institution after his five years at the training school.
However, his days of hiding behind the Fifth Amendment were numbered.
In May 1994, President Bill Clinton flew to
Providence, where he was scheduled to meet and
discuss state affairs. Thousands of demonstrators and a circling
airplane that carried the banner "Alert! Killer of 4 Craig Price Moving
Here!" greeted
Clinton as he
arrived in the city. It was clear that the citizens of
Rhode Island wanted
something done about the Craig Price matter, and they were not going to
give up until the problem was solved.
In a televised interview, Clinton expressed his dismay about Craig being
let out in approximately six months. He suggested that the records of
juvenile offenders should not be sealed but publicly accessible. He also
mentioned that the laws needed to be changed to prevent juveniles with a
violent history from purchasing firearms.
Just 15 days after Clinton
aired his comments,
Rhode Island
lawmakers reviewed bills concerning public access to juvenile criminal
records and juvenile gun laws. However, the problem concerning Craig's
release was still unanswered. Craig's luck was about to change.
On June 8, 1994,
Rhode Island residents were shocked to learn
that Craig was indicted on one count of simple assault and extortion for
threatening to injure Officer Mark Petrella, a training school employee.
One week later, Craig was arraigned and bail was set at $500,000. His
trial was scheduled for later that fall.
That same month Craig faced another problem. His
refusal to submit to psychiatric examinations and therapy had gone on
too long. He was warned that he was in danger of being held in contempt
of court if he failed to undergo treatment. Yet, he would not sway.
Craig's hearing took place on June 27 at the
Providence County Family Court before Judge S. Jeremiah Jr. During the
proceedings, Craig was again ordered to undergo a psychiatric exam but
his answer remained the same. The judge found him in civil contempt and
added an extra year to his incarceration to be served at the Adult
Correctional Institution in Cranston, Rhode Island.
The only way that Craig could reduce the sentence was by submitting to
the court order.
After almost five years, Craig finally complied with
the order and agreed to undergo a psychiatric assessment. Dr. Barnum, a
forensic psychiatrist and former head of the Boston Juvenile Court
Clinic, led the evaluation. Even though Craig participated in the
assessment, he didn't do it whole-heartedly. In fact, it was discovered
that he lied about many of the events concerning the murders. It was a
matter that would later be addressed by the Family and District Courts.
In the meantime, all eyes were focused on the upcoming trial.
Judgment Day
On October 3, 1994, Craig's trial began at the
Superior Court in Providence. It was a long-awaited
showdown that held the media and country in suspense. A majority of
those who packed the courtroom were anxious to see if justice would
finally prevail. They wouldn't have to wait very long.
Overhearing the case was Judge Thomas Needham.
Attorney's Robert Mann and Katie Hynes led the defense team. Prosecutors
Patrick Youngs and Mike Stone represented the state's case against Craig.
The hushed courtroom listened intently to the opening
statements made by Stone, as he ushered in one of the state's most
highly publicized trials. He told jurors that they would learn how Craig
verbally assaulted Petrella, after he was given a disciplinary report to
sign for possession of contraband material (cigarettes and a lighter).
Moreover, they would hear how Craig threatened the officer if he
continued his job at the facility. The prosecution planned to introduce
five witnesses.
Mann's statements followed those of the prosecution.
When he addressed the jury, he didn't deny that Craig was angry at
Petrella's report or that he used inappropriate language during the
confrontation. However, he stated that he would introduce witnesses who
would prove that Craig never assaulted or extorted Petrella.
After the opening statements, the prosecution called
their first witness, Mark Petrella. For two hours Petrella gave a
detailed account of the confrontation and how Craig verbally attacked
him using profane language and then threatened to "snuff" him if he ever
returned to work. He also said that several officers witnessed the
incident and tried unsuccessfully to calm Craig's increasingly volatile
behavior.
Jurors also heard the testimony of four other
witnesses who worked at the training school. Their stories agreed with
Petrella's account. Author Lang claimed that at the end of the day the
state rested its case, pleased that it, "had gotten their point across
and the facts had not been contradicted."
The next day as the proceedings were set to continue,
Mann asked to excuse the jury so that he could address the court alone.
Once the jury had left, Mann asked the court for an acquittal based on
insufficient evidence. The judge denied the request and ordered the
continuation of the proceedings.
As the trial commenced, the defense team introduced
Antwyon Carter as their first witness. Carter was an employee at the
training school who witnessed the argument first hand between Petrella
and Craig. During his testimony, he claimed that he never heard Craig
use the word "snuff" against Petrella. Moreover, he suggested that he
didn't take any security measures during or after the incident because
he didn't believe the dispute was a life-threatening situation.
However, during cross-examination by the prosecution,
Carter contradicted himself by indicating that Craig's actions were
threatening. The defense's case was weakened by Carter's statement. They
decided it was time to bring on another witness who worked at the
facility. Yet, when the man took the stand, he also suggested that Craig
acted in a threatening way towards Petrella. The defense's case began to
fall apart.
The next day, Mann decided to let Craig testify on
his own behalf. It was the moment everyone waited for. All eyes turned
their attention to Craig when he recounted the argument he had with
Petrella.
Craig told the jury that after the cigarettes and
lighter were found in his possession, Petrella gave him the impression
that he would not report the incident. He suggested that he was
surprised and then angered when Petrella presented him with the
disciplinary report later that day. He admitted to shouting profanity at
the officer but denied having ever threatened to "snuff" him out. Craig
believed that Petrella's report was part of a conspiracy to keep him
locked up.
During cross-examination by the prosecution, Craig
flew into a rage, claiming that everyone lied to get him in trouble. He
told awed listeners that he was the only honest person who had taken the
stand during the trial. In fact, he accused prosecutors of being at the
head of the conspiracy to put him behind bars permanently.
Craig's outburst marked the end of the trial. Both
the defense and prosecution teams prepared to present their closing
arguments for the following day. By the time the news of Craig's
testimony hit the stand, many believed that his hope of attaining
freedom was a lost cause. It was only a matter of time.
The Verdict
On October 6, 1994, the defense and the prosecution
teams presented their closing arguments. Following brief but powerful
arguments, the jury retired to deliberate on the case. It would take
them a day to reach a decision.
The next afternoon the jury returned their verdict.
Craig was found guilty on both counts of extortion and simple assault.
According to Lang, when the verdict was read, "those listening seemed to
feel that what he was really found guilty of was the long-ago murders."
Relief spread throughout much of the courtroom as fears of Craig
returning to society rapidly diminished.
That December, a hearing was held to determine
Craig's punishment. Judge Needham sentenced him to 15 years, eight of
which were suspended, at the Adult Correctional Institution in
Cranston. Craig's problems weren't over yet.
According to a 2004 article in The Providence
Journal, Craig bit a correctional officer's finger during a brawl in
February 1996. The article stated that prosecutors took "the uncommon
step" of charging him for probation violation, even though he was still
imprisoned. He was also charged with assault. Craig was found guilty of
the accusations and sentenced to an additional year in prison.
The next year, Craig was placed on trial for criminal
contempt because he failed to comply with the psychological evaluations
ordered by the state. The charges against him stemmed from complaints
from psychiatrists who claimed that he lied about the events surrounding
the murders. During the trial, Craig admitted to the charges and he was
eventually found guilty. According to court records, Craig received an
additional 25 years on top of his other sentences. Ten of the years were
to be served outright with 15 years probation.
In October 1998, seven more years were added to
Craig's sentence for assaulting a correctional officer. It would not be
his last time. In February 1999 and again in October 2001, Craig was
sentenced to a total of four more years for again verbally and
physically assaulting correctional officers.
To date, there is no telling exactly when Craig Price
will ever be released from prison. His projected release date is
scheduled for February 2022. However, some don't expect Craig will be
released until well after the date, because of his continuing volatile
behavior towards prison guards. Many Rhode Islanders prefer it that way.