Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating
new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help
the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm
to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.
Scott Andrew
MINK
Classification: Murderer
Characteristics:
Parricide
Number of victims: 2
Date of murders:
September 19,
2000
Date of arrest:
4 days after
Date of birth:
October 13,
1963
Victims profile: William Minks,
79, and Sheila Minks, 72(his
parents)
Method of murder:
Beating with a claw hammer
/ Stabbing
with knife
Location: Montgomery County, Ohio, USA
Status:
Executed
by lethal injection in Ohio on July 20,
2004
The 37 year old Mink lived with his elderly parents in Union, 10
miles from Dayton, Ohio. On the evening of September 19th, 2000, as
his parents slept,
Mink became angry because they had hidden his car
keys. They had done so in the past to prevent him from leaving the
house to purchase drugs and alcohol.
Mink went to their bedroom and beat both of them with a claw hammer,
until the hammer broke, next he beat them with cutting boards, until
they broke, and then he repeatedly stabbed his parents with kitchen
knives and strangled his mother with an electrical cord.
Mink then
stole his parents' credit cards and sold their belongings to
purchase crack cocaine.
The bodies of 79 year old William Minks and 72 year old Sheila Minks
were found four days after they were slain when their daughters
drove to the apartment to check on them and then called police.
Mink turned himself in and eventually confessed to the murders. He
pled guilty to the charges and waived appeals.
Final Meal:
On Monday, Mink requested for his special meal a T-bone steak; baked
potato with sour cream and butter; steamed broccoli and cauliflower;
a hamburger with cheese, onion, lettuce, tomato, ketchup and mustard;
french fries with extra salt and Pepsi. Mink finished everything
except the broccoli. In the morning before his 10:26 am execution,
Mink smoked cigarettes and drank coffee but didn't eat.
Final Words:
"I just thank you for giving me the chance to make a final statement.
I have made peace with my family and God."
ClarkProsecutor.org
Ohio Department of
Rehabilitation and Correction
Inmate #: 413511
Inmate: SCOTT ANDREW MINK
Race: White
Gender: Male
DOB: 10/13/63
County of Conviction: MONTGOMERY
Received at DOC: 07/11/01
Offenses: AGGRAVATED MURDER, AGGRAVATED ROBBERY, THEFT
Institution: Mansfield Correctional Institution
Scott Andrew
Mink, (October 13, 1963 -
July 20, 2004), was executed by the State of Ohio. A
drug addict and alcoholic, he had been sentenced to
die on June 29, 2001 for beating his 79-year-old
father and 72-year-old mother to death with a hammer.
The crimes occurred on September
19, 2000, when Mink, angry with his parents because
they hid their car keys to prevent him from leaving
the house to buy drugs and alcohol, attacked William
and Sheila Mink while they slept in their rural
Montgomery County home.
Enraged at being thwarted in his
quest to get high, Mink beat his sleeping parents
with a claw hammer until the hammer broke. He then
battered them with cutting boards until those
shattered. Finally, he repeatedly stabbed his
parents with kitchen knives and strangled his mother
with an electrical cord. Mink then stole his parents'
credit cards and sold their belongings to purchase
crack cocaine. He later confessed the brutal
slayings to police.
He pled guilty before a panel of
three judges and asked for a death sentence, which
the judges handed down. Under Ohio law, all death
sentences are automatically reviewed by an appellate
court regardless of the inmate's desire to appeal.
After his conviction was upheld by the Ohio Supreme
Court on direct appeal in April 2004, Mink dropped
his efforts to fight his sentence.
Mink spent 1,118 days on death
row before being executed by lethal injection – the
second-shortest time, aside from Rocky Barton, since
Ohio began executing criminals in 1999.
Scott Mink Clemency Report
STATE OF OHIO
ADULT PAROLE AUTHORITY
COLUMBUS, OHIO
Date of Meeting: July 9, 2004 - Minutes of the
SPECIAL MEETING of the Adult Parole Authority held at 1030 Alum
Creek Drive, Columbus, Ohio 43205.
IN RE: SCOTT A. MINK # 413511 MANCI
SUBJECT: Death Penalty Clemency
CRIME, CONVICTION: Aggravated Murder (4 cts), with two death penalty
specifications Aggravated Robbery (2 cts)
DATE, PLACE OF CRIME: September 19, 2000 Union, Ohio
COUNTY: Montgomery
CASE NUMBER: 00CR2900
VICTIM: William Mink, Shelia Mink
Death Penalty Specifications to each Murder count:
1. Escape detection or apprehension. 2. Committing or attempting
Aggravated Robbery. 3. Conduct killing two or more people.
PLEA: Guilty (3 judge panel)
VERDICT: Guilty to indictment (3 judge panel)
SENTENCE: Death, 9 years imprisonment
ADMITTED TO INSTITUTION: July 11, 2001
TIME SERVED: 37 months
AGE AT ADMISSION: 37 years old, DOB: October 13, 1963
JAIL TIME CREDIT: 13 days
PAROLE ELIGIBILITY: N/A
PRESIDING JUDGE: Honorable David Sunderland, Honorable Gregory L.
Frost, Honorable Gregory A. Godown
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY: Matthias H. Heck, Jr.
ACCOMPLICE: None
FOREWORD:
The Honorable Bob Taft, Governor of the State of
Ohio, and the Ohio Parole Board pursuant to section 2967.03 of the
Ohio Revised Code, and Parole Board Policy 105- PBD-01 initiated
clemency in this case. A Death Penalty Clemency Review Hearing was
conducted on July 9, 2004, with seven members of the Ohio Parole
Board participating. Attorney Gary Crimm represented Scott Mink.
Present at the hearing, on behalf of the State, were Assistant
Montgomery County Prosecutors Dan Brandt and Carley Ingram. After
reviewing the information provided and deliberating, the Parole
Board voted and reached a unanimous decision. We now submit to the
Honorable Bob Taft, Governor of the State of Ohio our report and
recommendation.
OFFENSE:
The following account of the instant crime was
obtained from the Ohio Supreme Court’s review of this case on April
14, 2004, via appeal as of right, whereupon said court affirmed the
conviction and sentence imposed by the Montgomery County Court of
Common Pleas.
The evidence at trial revealed that in September,
2000, Scott A. Mink, 36 years old, resided with his parents, 79-year-old
William and 72-year-old Sheila Mink, in their second-floor duplex
apartment in Union, Ohio. Mink used illegal drugs while living with
his parents. As his drug use increased, his parents set curfew
limits and restrictions on the use of his truck.
In early to mid-September, 2000, Mink’s parents
informed Mink that he would not be allowed to join them in their
move to a smaller apartment. On September 18, 2000 William G. Mink,
Mink’s brother, asked Mink about his moving plans, and he replied,
“kind of nasty like, … don’t worry about it, I’ve got a plan”.
Around 9:00 p.m. on September 19, 2000, Mink and
Bryan Werling were drinking and smoking crack cocaine at Werling’s
apartment in West Milton. Around 9:30 p.m., Mink’s parents called
Mink at Werling’s apartment and told Mink to return home. Mink then
departed and told Werling that “he had to get home or he wasn’t
going to have a place to stay.”
At approximately 10:00 p.m., Mink arrived home.
After his parents went to bed, Mink looked for his truck keys so
that he could leave the apartment and get more drugs. Mink was
unable to find the keys, and after realizing that his parents had
hidden them, he had a “fit of uncontrollable rage”.
According to his subsequent confession, Mink went
into his parents’ bedroom sometime after 11:20 p.m. They were
sleeping on adjacent twin beds, and he repeatedly hit them with a
hammer. The hammer broke while he was striking them. Mink left his
parents’ bedroom and returned with two kitchen knives and an
extension cord. Mink then stabbed each of them several times. One
knife broke during the attack, and Mink left the other knife in his
mother’s chest. Mink also strangled his mother with the extension
cord. Finally, Mink repeatedly struck both parents with two cutting
boards that he had taken from the kitchen. After one cutting board
broke, Mink reassembled it and put it back on the kitchen counter.
Following the attack, Mink washed up and put on
fresh clothes. Mink then took $7 and a British Petroleum (“BP”)
credit card from his father’s wallet and took his mother’s Bank One
card. After finding his truck keys, Mink left the apartment, went to
a Bank One automatic teller machine, and withdrew $10 from his
parents’ account. Mink then purchased what he thought was crack for
$20. Around 1:30 or 2:30 a.m. on September 20, 2000 Mink returned
home and discovered that the crack was not real. Mink then took five
or six of his mother’s tranquilizers and went to sleep.
Mink woke up in the late afternoon of September
20, 2000. Mink then moved his father’s body off his bed and laid him
on top of his mother’s body, which was lying between the twin beds.
He covered the bodies with blankets to keep them out of view. Later
that evening, Mink traded his father’s Ford Escort to a drug dealer
for $ 50 to $ 100 worth of rock cocaine.
Around 5:00 a.m. on September 21, 2000 Mink
phoned James Ornduff to ask whether he knew anyone interested in
buying a television. Mink said that his “parents were out of town
and he was trying to get some money up for groceries.” Mink then
drove to East Dayton, where he exchanged his parents’ television for
$30 worth of crack. Mink also used his father’s BP credit card to
purchase cigarettes, beer, and a gallon of milk.
Later on the same
morning, Mink called Ornduff again and requested his help in selling
a recliner, a microwave, a couple of pictures, a clock, and a watch.
Mink said that his parents were on vacation and that they wanted him
to clean out the garage. Mink loaded the property in his truck and
transported it to Ornduff. Mink returned home around noon.
Mink’s three sisters and his brother lived in the
Dayton area and frequently visited and talked with their parents on
the phone. The sisters became concerned about their parents after
they were unable to contact them on September 20th. Around noon on
September 21st, the sisters drove to their parents’ apartment to
check on their well-being.
When the sisters pulled into the driveway,
they saw Mink entering their parents’ apartment. The sisters then
pounded on the front door and shouted for Mink to come out. When
Mink answered the door, he would not let his sisters inside the
apartment and said that he did not know the whereabouts of their
parents. The sisters left to notify the police. As they arrived at
the police department, which was a short distance behind their
parents’ apartment, the sisters saw Mink walking to his truck.
The
sisters confronted Mink in the parking lot and asked for the keys to
the apartment. One of them asked, “Scott, did you hurt Mom and Dad?
And he said no. Mink then gave them the keys and drove away. The
sisters entered the front door of the apartment, which opened into
their parents’ darkened bedroom. They did not recognize that their
parents’ bodies were under blankets between the beds. However, the
sisters knew that something was wrong because their father’s glasses
and billfold were on the dresser even though the car was gone. The
sisters left the apartment and called the police.
At 12:41 p.m. on September 21, 2000 Officer
Darrin Goudy, a Union police officer, was dispatched to the Minks’
apartment to check on the welfare of the residents. After talking to
the three sisters outside, Officer Goudy entered the apartment and
found the bodies of William and Sheila lying between the beds.
Police secured the crime scene, obtained a search warrant, and began
collecting evidence.
William’s body was found lying on top of Sheila’s
body, and their clothing and the surrounding floor were covered in
blood. A kitchen knife was sticking out of Sheila’s chest, and a
cord was wrapped around her neck. The head of a broken hammer, a
knife blade, and a wooden cutting board were on the floor near the
bodies. The hammer handle and the knife handle were under the
blankets and sheets on a bed. Blood spatters were found on a roll of
carpet padding underneath the bed, suggesting that the victims were
also attacked while on the floor.
Police found a bloody wood-cutting board on the
kitchen counter that had been broken into three pieces and
reassembled. An empty microwave stand in the kitchen and an open
space near a loose TV cable in the living room suggested that
property had been taken from the apartment. The police also found a
pair of bloody sneakers and a bloody teeshirt in Mink’s separate
bedroom.
On September 22, 2000 police contacted Ornduff
after phone records showed that Mink had talked with him a number of
times after the murders. Police then seized the television, recliner,
microwave, two pictures, and a wall clock that Mink had transferred
to Ornduff. Additionally, police learned that Mink had used or
attempted to use his father’s BP card seven or eight times after the
murders. The police also located and seized William Mink’s Ford
Escort, which Mink had exchanged for drugs. Subsequent, laboratory
testing confirmed the presence of blood on the driver’s side seat
belt and the driver’s side door.
After leaving his sisters at the apartment on
September 21, 2000 Mink stayed on a farm near Tipp City. Around 8:00
p.m. on September 24, 2000 Mink turned himself in at the Tipp City
Police Department. Mink stated that he had “done something awful and
had woke up in a field somewhere west of Tipp City.” Mink was then
arrested and taken into police custody.
Around 11:00 p.m. on September 24, 2000 Detective
Rick Bergman and Detective Thomas Peed interviewed Mink about
William’s and Sheila’s murders. Mink was advised of his Miranda
rights, which he waived. Mink provided detailed oral and written
accounts of the murders that reflect the facts already described.
Mink also gave a videotaped interview admitting his guilt.
Dr. Kent Harshbarger, Deputy Coroner for
Montgomery County, performed autopsies on both victims. William was
stabbed 13 times, suffered at least 13 blunt-force impacts to the
head, and endured four blunt-force impacts on the rest of his body.
Other injuries on William’s hand, wrist, and lower leg were
defensive injuries and showed that William had been alive and
defended against the attacks. William died from “multiple trauma,
which consisted of blunt force trauma and multiple stab wounds.”
Sheila suffered nine blunt-force impacts to the
head, four stab wounds to her chest and back, and 33 superficial
stab wounds. The knife protruding into her chest extended four to
four-and-one-half inches into her right lung. Sheila’s blunt-force
injuries were consistent with blows caused by the cutting board and
hammer found at the scene. Sheila also suffered fractured bones in
her neck due to strangulation and “was alive when all those injuries
were inflicted.”
Dr. Harshbarger concluded that Sheila died from
“multiple traumatic injuries, which include blunt force injuries,
stab wounds and strangulation.” Mink was subsequently indicted on
four counts of aggravated murder for the deaths of his parents.
Count 3 charged Mink with the aggravated murder of William with
prior calculation and design, and Count 4 charged Mink with the
aggravated murder of William during commission of a robbery. Count 5
charged Mink with the aggravated murder of Sheila with prior
calculation and design, and Count 6 charged Mink with the aggravated
murder of Sheila during commission of a robbery. Additionally, Mink
was charged with aggravated robbery of William in Count 1 and
aggravated robbery of Sheila in Count 2.
The four counts of aggravated murder each
contained three identical death penalty specifications: murder to
escape detection or apprehension, R.C. 2929.04(A)(3), murder while
committing or attempting to commit aggravated robbery, R.C.
2929.04(A)(7), and murder as a “course of conduct” involving killing
two or more people, RC. 2929.04(A)(5).
At trial, Mink waived counsel and pled guilty.
After reviewing court-ordered competency evaluations and questioning
Mink about his decisions, the court ruled that Mink was competent to
stand trial, competent to waive counsel and represent himself, and
competent to waive a jury trial. His counsel were ordered to remain
as his legal advisors. Before the three-judge panel, Mink entered
pleas of guilty, and the State presented evidence of his guilt The
panel found Mink guilty of Counts 1 through 6 and Specifications 2
and 3 of Counts 3 through 6. The panel found Mink not guilty of
Specification 1 of Counts 3 through 6.
During the penalty phase, Mink waived the
presentation of mitigating evidence and requested the death penalty.
After finding that Mink was competent to waive mitigation, the court
sentenced Mink to death for the murders and to prison terms for the
remaining offenses.
Details: The offender was an employee of Ferrell Gas. On 7/13/00 he
took the following items without permission from the company: power
washer, vacuum, microwave oven, computer, monitor and printer. He
sold the computer, monitor, and printer for $20.00 crack cocaine. At
a later time he sold the power washer, vacuum, and microwave oven
for another $20.00 crack cocaine.
INSTITUTIONAL ADJUSTMENT:
For the offense of Breaking & Entering
2000CR2162, Scott Mink was initially referred for Diversion. However,
the defendant was rejected for Diversion on 8/31/00, because of an
admitted crack cocaine problem for which he was receiving inpatient
treatment at Good Samaritan Hospital Mental Unit. Found to be an
inappropriate candidate for Diversion, the case was referred to the
grand jury. Since his 7/11/01 admission to prison, Scott Mink’s
adjustment has been unremarkable. He has had no serious conduct
reports and no program achievement.
PROPONENTS TO CLEMENCY:
The Ohio Parole Board received no written
application for clemency on Mink’s behalf and Mink himself elected
not to be interviewed by a member of the Board. Attorney Gary Crimm
represented Mr. Mink at the clemency hearing conducted July 9, 2004.
In a very brief statement, Mr. Crimm indicated that Mr. Mink has
always admitted killing his parents, offered no mitigation at trial,
and does not wish that clemency be granted. No mitigation was
offered. Mr. Crimm offered no closing remarks. The Ohio Parole Board
received two letters from residents of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and
the United Kingdom requesting commutation to life imprisonment. Both
letters cite Mr. Mink’s admission to the crimes, waiver of counsel
and mitigation, as well as his medical history of depression,
suicide attempts and addiction.
OPPONENTS TO CLEMENCY:
Daniel Brandt and Carley Ingram, Assistant
Montgomery County Prosecutors, represented the State of Ohio at the
hearing before the Parole Board on July 9, 2004. Arguments offered
in opposition to the granting of Executive Clemency included:
• There exists no doubt that Mink committed the
crimes for which he received the death penalty. He turned himself in
four days after the killings and confessed to what he had done.
• Mink told his lawyers that he wanted to plead
guilty to the charges and he did not want to offer any evidence in
mitigation. Mink’s lawyers informed the court that Mink intended to
plead guilty and present no mitigation, and that an independent
examiner had determined that Mink was competent to make that
decision. The presiding judge ordered two additional evaluations,
both of which found Mink to be competent to decide to plead guilty
to the charges and to waive the presentation of mitigating evidence.
• A three-judge panel found Mink guilty of all of
the charges and most of the specifications. The State asked that its
evidence be re-admitted as proof of aggravating circumstances, and
Mink declined to offer any evidence in mitigation. The panel
sentenced him to death.
• The Supreme Court of Ohio unanimously affirmed
his conviction and sentence, holding, among other things, that the
psychologists that evaluated Mink’s competence were qualified to do
so and that reliable and credible evidence supported the conclusion
that Mink was competent.
• The Ohio Supreme Court also found that the
aggravating circumstances outweighed the mitigating evidence beyond
a reasonable doubt: “Mink’s course of conduct and the robbery-murder
of his elderly parents are grave circumstances. Moreover, the
mitigating evidence pales in comparison to the aggravating
circumstances of these murders. Mink’s history and background and
his lack of a significant criminal record, as well as other
mitigation, are easily outweighed by these serious aggravating
circumstances.”
• There is no manifest injustice. Mink killed his
parents in an assault that is almost unimaginable in its sustained
violence. As found by the trial court and the Supreme Court of Ohio,
the slight mitigation that can be found in the record falls far
short of offsetting the aggravating circumstances.
• Mink has not asked for clemency and he has
declined to be interviewed for this hearing. There is no reason to
offer mercy to Scott Mink. He does not seek it, nor do his crimes
warrant it.
CONCLUSION:
The Parole Board reviewed the documents and
deliberated extensively on the information provided. No mitigation
was offered and no request for mercy was made by, or on behalf of,
Scott Mink. The Parole Board found insufficient mitigating factors
to outweigh the aggravating factors in this case. Therefore, the
undersigned members find that the exercise of clemency is not
warranted.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Ohio Parole Board, seven (7) members
participating, by a vote of seven (7) to zero (0), recommends to the
Honorable Bob Taft, Governor of the State of Ohio, that Executive
Clemency be denied in the case of Scott A. Mink #A413511.
ProDeathPenalty.com
Scott Mink was sentenced to death at age 37 for
killing his parents. His parents, William and Sheila Mink, were
found dead Sept. 21 at their home in Union, 10 miles from Dayton,
Ohio.
Mink was convicted of the beating deaths of his parents, 79-year
old William Mink and 72-year old Sheila Mink, on September 19th,
2000, as they slept in their home in the Village of Union. Mink was
angry at his parents because they would hide their car keys to
prevent him from leaving the house to purchase drugs and alcohol.
When his parents were sleeping, Mink beat them with a claw hammer,
until the hammer broke, next he beat them with cutting boards, until
they broke, and then he repeatedly stabbed his parents with kitchen
knives and strangled his mother with an electrical cord. Mink then
stole his parents' credit cards and sold their belongings to
purchase crack cocaine. Mink later confessed to police.
Killer's execution set for Tuesday
By James Hannah - Cincinnati Post
AP July 19, 2004
Dayton - When his parents hid the keys to his
blue Isuzu Trooper to keep him from going out to buy drugs, Scott
Mink snapped. The 36-year-old man got a claw hammer out of his
father's toolbox on the porch and then walked into the bedroom of
his sleeping parents.
William and Sheila Mink, 79 and 72, were
bludgeoned with the hammer, stabbed with kitchen knives and beaten
with cutting boards. Sheila Mink also was strangled, her neck broken
with an electric cord. Scott Mink then bought drugs by selling his
parents' possessions, including pictures off the walls of the
upstairs duplex where the three lived in the community of Union,
just northwest of Dayton. Four days later, Mink turned himself in to
police and confessed to killing the couple.
Mink pleaded guilty to their murders and
currently sits on death row, scheduled to be executed Tuesday for
the September 2000 slayings. Last week, the Ohio Parole Board by a
7-0 vote recommended that Gov. Bob Taft deny clemency. Mink told a
court-appointed psychologist: "I deserve it. ... I really don't want
to die, but the severity of the crime and the circumstances fit the
death penalty for me." Mink, now 40, declined requests for an
interview. Calls seeking comment from his brother and three sisters
were not returned.
Mink's execution -- three years from when he was
convicted -- would be the fastest an Ohio inmate's death sentence
was carried out since the state re-enacted the death penalty in
1981. The previous fastest occurred with Wilford Berry, who was
executed in 1999 after being convicted in 1990. Mink also would be
the first inmate executed since that time to plead guilty.
Dan Brandt, assistant Montgomery County
prosecutor, said Mink deserves the death penalty. "The crimes
themselves were especially heinous in nature due to the fact that
they were the defendants' own parents and were brutally attacked
while they lay in bed sleeping," Brandt said. "And there was the
ferocious nature of the killings themselves."
The youngest of five children, Mink graduated
from Colonel White High School in Dayton and took a few courses at
Sinclair Community College. He never married and lived with his
parents most of his life. Tired of their son's growing crack habit,
the Minks had set a 10 p.m. curfew and sometimes hid the keys to his
truck. Mink complained that his parents treated him like a child and
that his father would only give him $10 or $20 at a time for
spending money. Just before they died, the Minks told their son he
would have to find a place of his own because they would be moving
to a smaller apartment. They never got the chance.
After the attack on his parents, Mink found his
keys. He took $7 and his father's ATM card. Mink withdrew $10 with
the ATM card because there was only $12 in the account and bought a
fake substance he thought was crack. The next day Mink sold his
father's Ford Escort for $50 to $100 worth of crack. The day after
that, he traded his parents' television for $30 in drugs. He later
sold a lounge chair, a clock and pictures off the wall for money to
buy drugs. William and Sheila Minks' bodies were found four days
after they were slain when their daughters drove to the apartment to
check on them and then called police.
Mink turned himself in to Tipp
City police, telling them he had done something awful. He later
confessed to killing his parents. On Oct. 4, 2000, Mink was indicted
on charges of aggravated murder with death penalty specifications.
The following April, he announced his intention to waive a jury
trial, plead guilty and waive his right to present any evidence on
his behalf.
Thomas Martin, a court-appointed psychologist who
evaluated Mink, said Mink told him he did not fear death. "I have a
firm belief that I still have a chance of getting into heaven; God
can forgive," Mink said.
Man to die today for killing parents
Cleveland Plain Dealer
July 20, 2004
Associated Press - Lucasville - A man convicted
of bludgeoning his parents to death sipped coffee and watched
television Monday, a day before his scheduled execution. Scott Mink,
40, has dropped his court appeals and is scheduled to die by
injection today. Mink was transferred Monday morning from Mansfield
to the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility. He was relaxing and
talking with prison staff, prison spokesman Larry Green said. "He's
pleasant," Green said. "He seems comfortable, and he's in good
spirits."
Mink pleaded guilty to killing his parents during
a night of drinking and doing drugs on Sept. 19, 2000. He killed
William and Sheila Mink as they slept, beating them with a hammer
and stabbing them with kitchen knives. Mink, who lived with his
parents, was enraged that they had hidden the keys to his truck to
keep him from buying drugs. After the killings, Mink bought drugs by
selling his par ents' possessions, including pictures off the walls
of the upstairs duplex where the three lived in the community of
Union, just northwest of Dayton. Four days later, Mink turned
himself in to police and confessed to killing the couple.
Gov. Bob Taft on Monday declined to stop Mink's
scheduled execution. Last week, the Ohio Parole Board recommended
7-0 against clemency. If the execution proceeds, it would be the
quickest an Ohio inmate's death sentence was carried out since the
state restored the death penalty in 1981. Mink also would be the
first inmate executed who pleaded guilty, and the first put to death
for killing family members.
On Monday, Mink requested for his special meal a
T-bone steak; baked potato with sour cream and butter; steamed
broccoli and cauliflower; a hamburger with cheese, onion, lettuce,
tomato, ketchup and mustard; french fries with extra salt and Pepsi.
National Coalition to Abolish
the Death Penalty
Scott Mink, OH - July 20, 10 AM EST
The state of Ohio is scheduled to execute Scott
Mink, a white man, July 20 for the 2000 murders of his parents,
William and Sheila Mink, in Montgomery County. In 2001, Mr. Mink
fired his attorneys and asked to be executed.
Mr. Mink was under the influence of alcohol and
crack cocaine when he killed his parents and sold their television
and car to a drug dealer in exchange for approximately $100 worth of
crack cocaine. Two days later, Mr. Mink turned himself in and
confessed. Mr. Mink waived his right to counsel, entered a guilty
plea, presented no evidence, and asked a three-judge panel to
sentence him to death.
He has a history of depression and suicide
attempts, and has a history of repeated hospitalization. He had made
several suicide attempts in the months preceding these murders,
which were directly related to his addiction to crack cocaine. Mr.
Mink is the second person scheduled for execution in Ohio in July.
Both are “voluntary” executions.
About 110 men and women have been executed in the
USA since 1977 after giving up their appeals at some stage in the
process Although such executions are sometimes characterized as a
form of state-assisted suicide, "prisoner-assisted homicide" might
be a more accurate label. For if a death row inmate seeks to commit
actual suicide, as more than 50 condemned prisoners have
successfully done since 1977, the state will make every effort to
prevent it.
The cases show that there may be many factors
contributing to a prisoner's decision not to pursue appeals against
his or her death sentence, including mental disorder, physical
illness, remorse, bravado, religious belief, the severity of
conditions of confinement including prolonged isolation and lack of
physical contact visits, the bleak alternative of life imprisonment
without the possibility of parole, pessimism about appeal prospects,
a quest for notoriety, or simply as a way for the prisoner to gain a
semblance of control over a situation in which they are otherwise
helpless (Amnesty International, 2003).
Please contact Gov. Bob Taft and urge him to stop
the execution of Scott Mink.
Ohioans to Stop Executions
Scott Mink - execution date set for July 20, 2004
Scott Mink was arrested for and convicted of the
Sept. 19, 2000, stabbing of his parents, William and Sheila Mink, 79
and 72. At the time of the murders, Mink was addicted to crack and
an alcoholic. He was under the influence of both alcohol and cocaine,
as well as other drugs, when the stabbings occurred. In April 2001,
Mink announced in court that he wanted to be executed for killing
his parents. His attorneys explained that he did not consider his
decision to be suicide, and his religious beliefs instructed him
that, if he committed suicide, he could not go to heaven and he
could not be forgiven.
On June 20, 2001, a three-judge panel sentenced
Mink to death. Acting as his own counsel, Scott Mink pleaded guilty
and asked the panel in Montgomery County to sentence him to
execution. The justices ruled unanimously that the 40-year-old was
competent when he rejected attorney help, entered his plea and
declined to present any evidence to argue for a sentence of life in
prison instead.
The June 20th decision, written by Justice Francis
E. Sweeney, the Supreme Court overruled 18 assignments of error
advanced by court-appointed appellate counsel representing Mink and
voted 7-0 to uphold the trial court's decision and sentence. The
justices were also charged with improperly explaining the meaning of
mitigation to Mink, thus leading him to abandon his appeals. On
April 14, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld Mink's conviction.
How Did Scott Mink Spend His Last Day?
Dayton Daily News
July 20, 2004
LUCASVILLE - Scott Mink, the Miami Valley man
convicted of bludgeoning his parents to death sipped coffee, smoked
cigarettes and watched television Monday, a day before his scheduled
execution. Mink, 40, has dropped his court appeals and is scheduled
to die by lethal injection Tuesday.
Mink was transferred Monday morning from a
Mansfield prison to the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility. He
spent the afternoon watching television and taking naps, prison
spokesman Larry Green said. Mink had conversations with prison staff
in the morning, and he met with his sister, Cheryl Williams, and his
niece, Kristen Williams, in the afternoon.
"He seems to be relaxed," Green said. "He's been
smoking Marlboros on and off all day."
Mink pleaded guilty to killing his parents in
their Union home during a night of drinking and doing drugs on Sept.
19, 2000. He killed William and Sheila Mink as they slept, beating
them with a hammer and stabbing them with kitchen knives.
Mink, who lived with his parents, was enraged
that his parents had hidden the keys to his truck to keep him from
buying drugs.
After the killings, Mink bought drugs by selling
his parents' possessions, including pictures off the walls of the
upstairs duplex. Four days later, Mink turned himself in to police
and confessed to killing the couple.
Gov. Bob Taft declined Monday to stop Mink's
scheduled execution. Last week, the Ohio Parole Board recommended
7-0 against clemency.
If the execution proceeds, it would be the
quickest an Ohio inmate's death sentence was carried out since the
state restored the death penalty in 1981.
On Monday, Mink had his special meal: a T-bone
steak; baked potato with sour cream and butter; steamed broccoli and
cauliflower; a hamburger with cheese, onion, lettuce, tomato,
ketchup and mustard; french fries with extra salt and Pepsi.
Green said Mink finished everything except the
broccoli.
Expected witnesses to the execution will be
Mink's siblings Cheryl Williams, Christine Martinson and William
Mink; niece Kristen Williams, and Monty Stevens, a clergyman
requested by the family, said prisons spokeswoman JoEllen Culp.
Mink Meets Death Serenely
By Tom Beyerlein - Dayton Daily News
July 20, 2004
LUCASVILLE | As his family looked on, Scott Mink
of Union serenely met his death by lethal injection Tuesday morning
for the September 2000 murders of his parents.
"I just thank you for giving me the chance to
make a final statement," Mink told Warden James Haviland as he lay
strapped to the execution table. "I have made peace with my family
and God."
The execution of Mink, 40, was unusually lengthy
because it took prison medical staff more than 20 minutes to install
intravenous receptacles in Mink's veins. Tom Stickrath, assistant
prisons director for Ohio, said Mink's veins were "brittle and they
kept collapsing" as staff attempted to insert the shunts.
Mink winked and gave his family, seated behind a
glass window, a thumbs-up sign from the execution table. Haviland
announced the time of death as 10:27 a.m. His remains will be
cremated and given to his family, a prison spokesman said.
"Our sorrow comes with a sense of peace in our
hearts that our brother's decision was the right one for him, and we
have made peace with him," Mink's eldest sister, Cheryl Williams,
said in a prepared statement. "As a family, we will cherish our
memories and move forward to create new ones for our children and
grandchildren. Our faith, our love that we have for each other, is
the legacy our parents left behind. We will remain steadfast in
honoring them by carrying this legacy forward."
A crack-addicted alcoholic who lived with his
parents, Mink became enraged when he learned that his parents had
hidden his car keys. He killed William and Sheila Mink, 79 and 72,
as they slept, beating them with a claw hammer until it broke, then
stabbing them with kitchen knives. While most executions take almost
two decades to be carried out, Mink's was the quickest since Ohio
resumed executions in 1999. Mink greatly accelerated the process by
pleading guilty and declining to appeal in court.
According to Larry Greene, spokesman for the
Southern Ohio Correctional Facility at Lucasville, Mink had a "contact
visit" with his family and his minister Monday afternoon and evening,
ate most of the "special meal" he selected, and went to sleep at
12:05 a.m. Tuesday. He slept soundly until he was awakened at 6:05
a.m. by prison staff. He declined to shower or eat breakfast,
instead splashing his face with water and having coffee and a
cigarette. He had a non-contact visit with family members from 6:30
to 8 a.m., then met with his attorneys, his family pastor and the
prison chaplain from 8 to 8:45. "The visits went very well," Greene
said. "He enjoyed the visits with family members. Just general
conversation."
In a roped-off parking lot outside the prison,
about 25 death penalty opponents — some holding signs — gathered to
protest the execution. "Somebody has to be here to say 'no' even if
we can't stop it," said Kathy Soltis, a member of the Cleveland
Coalition Against the Death Penalty, who has been at every execution
since the death penalty was reinstated in Ohio. Another protester,
Carl Hyde of Yellow Springs, said, "I'm pro-life, and pro-life means
not killing people." Jeff Combs of Springfield said the execution
sends a message that killing is OK. "If the government can do it,
why can't I do it?" he said.
Mink's brother, William, and sisters Claudia Mink,
Cheryl Williams and Christine Martinson witnessed the execution,
along with niece Kristin Williams, attorney Dennis Adkins and
family's pastor, the Rev. Monte Stevens of North Riverdale Lutheran
Church. Unlike past executions, at the family's request there was no
distinction between witnesses for the inmate and the victims, since
Mink killed his parents.
The witnesses watched on a television monitor
during the extended process of installing the shunts in Mink's arms
in a holding cell adjacent to the execution chamber. Throughout the
process, Mink closed his eyes, his legs crossed at the ankle.
Stevens read Romans 8:38-39 from the Bible: "I am convinced that
neither life, nor death ... will be able to separate us from the
love of Christ Jesus." He was reading from a book entitled, If Grace
Is True: Why God Will Save Every Person. The book, which was being
held by Christine Martinson through most of the execution, was
inscribed "Scott — Blessings."
"He is so calm," Claudia Mink said as she watched
medical staff installing the shunts. "He's ready," Cheryl Williams
said. "Yes, he is. Yes, he is," Claudia said.
At 10:17, the shunts finally installed, prison
staff helped to ease Mink off the bed in the holding cell and led
him into the execution chamber. Mink looked at the witnesses and
mouthed, "Hi." He looked at his family repeatedly as he was strapped
to the table, winking and giving a thumbs-up sign at one point. He
mouthed what appeared to be "I'm all right." Cheryl and Kristen
Williams, who sat side-by-side, at one point touched the glass
window separating them from Mink. The women sobbed and family
members held hands, locked arms and clutched each others' shoulders
to comfort one another.
Ohio Executes Man For Killing Parents
MSNBC News
July 20, 2004
10:36 a.m. EDT July 20, 2004 - A man whose drug-fueled
rage led him to kill his sleeping parents with a hammer and kitchen
knives was put to death Tuesday morning after declining to pursue
appeals that would have postponed his execution.
Scott Mink, 40 , died by lethal injection Tuesday
at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility. He was pronounced dead
at 10:27 a.m. It was the quickest an Ohio inmate's death sentence
was carried out since the state restored the death penalty in 1981.
It also would come a week after the execution of another man who
dropped his appeals, Stephen Vrabel of Youngstown.
On Tuesday morning, Mink smoked cigarettes and
drank coffee but didn't eat. The prison served him waffles, cereal,
milk, coffee and apple juice. "We took the breakfast to him but he
said he wasn't hungry," prison spokesman Larry Green said. Green
said Mink remained calm and cooperative. Mink spent Monday smoking
cigarettes, switching channels on a television in his cell and
taking short naps, said prison spokesman Larry Green. In the
afternoon, he met with his sister, Cheryl Williams, and his niece,
Kristen Williams.
Mink pleaded guilty to killing his parents during
a night of drinking and doing drugs on Sept. 19, 2000. He beat
William and Sheila Mink until the hammer broke and also struck them
with cutting boards and stabbed them with kitchen knives. Scott Mink,
who lived with his parents, was enraged that they had hidden the
keys to his truck to keep him from buying drugs. After the killings,
Mink bought crack cocaine by selling his parents' possessions,
including pictures off the walls of the upstairs duplex where the
three lived in the community of Union, just northwest of Dayton.
Four days later, Mink turned himself in to police and confessed.
After pleading guilty in 2001, Mink asked a three-judge
panel in Montgomery County to sentence him to death. "I do ask for
the death penalty, to be handed a sentence of death," he told the
panel just before the sentence. However, he later appealed, arguing
that two psychologists who examined him at trial were not qualified
to determine he was competent to reject help from lawyers and plead
guilty.
In April, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld Mink's
conviction and death sentence. The justices ruled unanimously that
Mink was competent when he rejected attorney help, entered his plea
and declined to present any evidence to argue instead for a lesser
sentence of life in prison. Last week, defense attorney Gary Crim
told the Ohio Parole Board that Mink wishes there to be no further
actions to stop his execution. "I think that his life since he woke
up after he sobered up and was arrested is full of remorse," Crim
said. "That's his way of remorse, seeking execution."
Gov. Bob Taft declined Monday to stop Mink's
scheduled execution. The parole board recommended 7-0 against
clemency last week.
On Monday, Mink had for his special meal of a T-bone
steak; baked potato with sour cream and butter; steamed broccoli and
cauliflower; a hamburger with cheese, onion, lettuce, tomato,
ketchup and mustard; french fries with extra salt and Pepsi. Green
said Mink finished everything but the broccoli.
Expected witnesses to the execution were Mink's
siblings Cheryl Williams, Christine Martinson and William Mink;
niece Kristen Williams, and Monty Stevens, a clergyman requested by
the family, said prison spokeswoman JoEllen Culp.
State v. Mink, Case no. 2001-1429
Supreme Court of Ohio
Death Penalty
Montgomery County Common Pleas Court
Attorneys for Scott A. Mink of Union, Ohio,
ask the Supreme Court to overturn his aggravated murder
convictions or reduce his death sentence for the fatal
bludgeoning and stabbing of his parents, William and Sheila Mink,
in September 2000. Scott, who was in his late thirties but still
lived with his parents at the time, admitted killing his mother
and father in their beds by striking them repeatedly with a
hammer and a wooden cutting board and then stabbing them
multiple times with two kitchen knives while he was under the
influence of crack cocaine, alcohol and other drugs.
After concealing the bodies in the apartment,
Mink sold his father's car and other property taken from his
parents' home to buy drugs and alcohol over the next several
days. He abandoned the apartment after learning that his sisters
were suspicious about the parents' whereabouts. The sisters
called police, who discovered the bodies. After sleeping in a
field for three nights, Mink turned himself in to police and
confessed to the double murder.
During pretrial proceedings in Montgomery
County Common Pleas Court, Mink announced his intention to waive
a jury trial, plead guilty to all charges and death penalty
specifications, and waive his right to present mitigating
evidence during the sentencing phase of his trial. Mink also
told the court he wished to serve as his own attorney, and to
use his court-appointed defense lawyers only as advisors.
Although Mink did not claim to be incompetent,
the judge ordered a competency hearing. After two court-appointed
psychologists examined Mink and found him to be competent to
stand trial and waive various rights, he was tried by a three-judge
panel and found guilty of aggravated robbery and aggravated
murder with two death penalty specifications. During sentencing,
prosecutors presented evidence of aggravating factors in support
of the death penalty while Mink, acting as his own counsel,
offered no evidence in mitigation of a death sentence. The panel
imposed a sentence of death.
In their appeal to the Supreme Court,
attorneys for Mink raise 18 allegations of legal and/or
procedural error by the trial court. Among them are arguments
that:
Mink did not receive a valid competency
evaluation because he was taking prescription psychotropic
drugs at the time and the psychologists who performed the
evaluation were not physicians qualified to judge the
effects of that medication on his competency.
The examining psychologists did not
review Mink's medical records, which included prior suicide
attempts and treatment for severe depression, and did not
consult with a psychiatrist about his medical history prior
to pronouncing him competent.
Mink's guilty plea and waiver of
mitigation testimony were not “voluntary and knowing” as
required by law because the trial record shows that he did
not understand what kinds of mitigation evidence could be
presented, or that mitigation testimony could be offered
without claiming that it constituted an “excuse” for his
actions.
His trial counsel did not provide
effective assistance when they failed to object to the
qualifications of the examining psychologists or to the
validity of their finding that he was competent without
examining his medical history and records or consulting a
psychiatrist.
The state responds that the court-ordered
competency examination of Mink by two psychologists went well
beyond the requirements of the law because Mink had
already stipulated that he was competent and there was no claim
or evidence that he was unable either to understand the charges
against him or to assist with his own defense. Prosecutors argue
further that the examining psychologists were fully informed
about Mink's medical history and considered it in evaluating him,
and note that, while psychologists lack authority to
prescribe psychotropic medications, they have been held
fully competent to determine whether the effects of such
medication impair a patient's awareness and reasoning ability as
they relate to competence.